ArticlePloS one2020
Pooling region learning of visual word for image classification using bag-of-visual-words model.
Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the problem where there is not enough data to use Deep Learning, Bag-of-Visual-Words (BoVW) is still a good alternative for image classification. In BoVW model, many pooling methods are proposed to incorporate the spatial information of local feature into the image representation vector, but none of the methods devote to making each visual word have its own pooling regions. The practice of designing the same pooling regions for all the words restrains the discriminability of image representation, since the spatial distributions of the local features indexed by different visual words are not same. In this paper, we propose to make each visual word have its own pooling regions, and raise a simple yet effective method for learning pooling region. Concretely, a kind of small window named observation window is used to obtain its responses to each word over the whole image region. The pooling regions of each word are organized by a kind of tree structure, in which each node indicates a pooling region. For each word, its pooling regions are learned by constructing a tree with its labelled coordinate data. The labelled coordinate data consist of the coordinates of responses and image class labels. The effectiveness of our method is validated by observing if there is an obvious classification accuracy improvement after applying our method. Our experimental results on four small datasets (i.e., Scene-15, Caltech-101, Caltech-256 and Corel-10) show that, the classification accuracy is improved by about 1% to 2.5%. We experimentally demonstrate that the practice of making each word have its own pooling regions is beneficial to image classification task, which is the significance of our work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.