Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32502215›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides supplementation to suckling piglets: Assessment of pre- and post-weaning performance and gut health.

Miriam Ayuso, Joris Michiels, Sander Wuyts, Honglin Yan, Jeroen Degroote, Sarah Lebeer, Cindy Le Bourgot, Emmanuelle Apper, Maryam Majdeddin, Noémie Van Noten and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Miriam AyusoDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0001-6045-394X
Joris MichielsDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Laboratory for Animal Production and Animal Product Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sander WuytsDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Honglin YanDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Laboratory for Animal Production and Animal Product Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Jeroen DegrooteDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Laboratory for Animal Production and Animal Product Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Sarah LebeerDepartment of Bioengineering, Faculty of Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Cindy Le BourgotR&D Department, Tereos, Moussy-Le-Vieux, France.
Emmanuelle ApperR&D Department, Tereos, Moussy-Le-Vieux, France.
Maryam MajdeddinDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Laboratory for Animal Production and Animal Product Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.
Noémie Van NotenDepartment of Animal Sciences and Aquatic Ecology, Laboratory for Animal Production and Animal Product Quality, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0002-9597-9404
Charlotte Vanden HoleDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Steven Van CruchtenDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Mario Van PouckeDepartment of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Luc PeelmanDepartment of Nutrition, Genetics and Ethology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Merelbeke, Belgium.
Chris Van GinnekenDepartment of Veterinary Medicine, Faculty of Pharmaceutical, Biomedical and Veterinary Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BEValeo (France) · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Farmers face difficulties in redeeming their investment in larger litter sizes since this comes with larger litter heterogenicity, lower litter resilience and risk of higher mortality. Dietary oligosaccharides, given to the sow, proved beneficial for the offspring's performance. However, giving oligosaccharides to the suckling piglet is poorly explored. Therefore, this field trial studied the effect of dietary short-chain fructo-oligosaccharides (scFOS; 1g/day; drenched) supplementation to low (LBW, lower quartile), normal (NBW, two intermediate quartiles) and high (HBW, upper quartile) birth weight piglets from birth until 7 or 21 days of age. Performance parameters, gut microbiome and short-chain fatty acids profile of feces and digesta were assessed at birth (d 0), d 7, weaning (d 21.5) and 2 weeks post-weaning (d 36.5). Additional parameters reflecting gut health (intestinal integrity and morphology, mucosal immune system) were analysed at d 36.5. Most parameters changed with age or differed with the piglet's birth weight. Drenching with scFOS increased body weight by 1 kg in NBW suckling piglets and reduced the post-weaning mortality rate by a 100%. No clear difference in the IgG level, the microbiota composition and fermentative activity between the treatment groups was observed. Additionnally, intestinal integrity, determined by measuring intestinal permeability and regenerative capacity, was similar between the treatment groups. Also, intestinal architecture (villus lenght, crypt depth) was not affected by scFOS supplementation. The density of intra-epithelial lymphocytes and the expression profiles (real-time qPCR) for immune system-related genes (IL-10, IL-1ß, IL-6, TNFα and IFNγ) were used to assess mucosal immunity. Only IFNγ expression, was upregulated in piglets that received scFOS for 7 days. The improved body weight and the reduced post-weaning mortality seen in piglets supplemented with scFOS support the view that scFOS positively impact piglet's health and resilience. However, the modes of action for these effects are not yet fully elucidated and its potential to improve other performance parameters needs further investigation.

Indexed as

Animal FeedDietary SupplementsAnimal HusbandryAnimal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, SucklingBody WeightFecesFemaleGastrointestinal MicrobiomeImmunity, MucosalIntestinal MucosaOligosaccharidesSus scrofaWeaningfructooligosaccharideOligosaccharides

Identifiers

PMID32502215
PMCPMC7274435
OpenAlexW3034122502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.