Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32502143›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2020

Detecting differential alternative splicing events in scRNA-seq with or without Unique Molecular Identifiers.

Yu Hu, Kai Wang, Mingyao Li

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yu HuDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-4163-7166
Kai WangCenter for Cellular and Molecular Therapeutics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-5585-982X
Mingyao LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-8180-0621
University of Pennsylvania · USChildren's Hospital of Philadelphia · US

Funding

Elucidation of Tissue-Specific Transcriptomic Profiles in Cardiometabolic DiseaseR01HL113147 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO, REILLY, MUREDACH P · 2012 to 2022
$6.8M
Single-Cell Transcriptomic Analysis of Human RetinaR01EY030192 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2019 to 2022
$2.6M
Statistical Methods for Single-Cell TranscriptomicsR01GM125301 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO, ZHANG, NANCY R · 2017 to 2020
$1.5M
Statistical Methods for Transcriptome Profiling Using RNA SequencingR01GM108600 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LI, MINGYAO · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030192NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL113147NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108600NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM125301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The emergence of single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) technology has made it possible to measure gene expression variations at cellular level. This breakthrough enables the investigation of a wider range of problems including analysis of splicing heterogeneity among individual cells. However, compared to bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq data are much noisier due to high technical variability and low sequencing depth. Here we propose SCATS (Single-Cell Analysis of Transcript Splicing) for differential splicing analysis in scRNA-seq, which achieves high sensitivity at low coverage by accounting for technical noise. SCATS models scRNA-seq data either with or without Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs). For non-UMI data, SCATS explicitly models technical noise by accounting for capture efficiency and amplification bias through the use of external spike-ins; for UMI data, SCATS models capture efficiency and further accounts for transcriptional burstiness. A key aspect of SCATS lies in its ability to group "exons" that originate from the same isoform(s). Grouping exons is essential in splicing analysis of scRNA-seq data as it naturally aggregates spliced reads across different exons, making it possible to detect splicing events even when sequencing depth is low. To evaluate the performance of SCATS, we analyzed both simulated and real scRNA-seq datasets and compared with existing methods including Census and DEXSeq. We show that SCATS has well controlled type I error rate, and is more powerful than existing methods, especially when splicing difference is small. In contrast, Census suffers from severe type I error inflation, whereas DEXSeq is more conservative. When applied to mouse brain scRNA-seq datasets, SCATS identified more differential splicing events with subtle difference across cell types compared to Census and DEXSeq. With the increasing adoption of scRNA-seq, we believe SCATS will be well-suited for various splicing studies. The implementation of SCATS can be downloaded from https://github.com/huyustats/SCATS.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingAnimalsExonsLimit of DetectionMiceRNA, Small CytoplasmicSequence Analysis, RNARNA, Small Cytoplasmic

Identifiers

PMID32502143
PMCPMC7299405
OpenAlexW3033736641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.