Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32502050›Full record

Trial reportMedicine2020

Effect of video-guided educational intervention on school engagement of adolescent students with hearing impairment: Implications for health and physical education.

Uche D Asogwa, Theresa Onyema Ofoegbu, Chimaobi Samuel Ogbonna, Michael Eskay, Ngozi O Obiyo, Godfrey C Nji, Oliver Rotachukwu Ngwoke, Chiedu Eseadi, Christian Iheanacho Agboti, Chinedozie Uwakwe and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Uche D AsogwaDepartment of Arts Education.
Theresa Onyema OfoegbuDepartment of Arts Education.
Chimaobi Samuel OgbonnaDepartment of Arts Education.
Michael EskayDepartment of Educational Foundations.
Ngozi O ObiyoDepartment of Educational Foundations.
Godfrey C NjiDepartment Human Kinetics and Health Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, P.M.B. 410001, Enugu State.
Oliver Rotachukwu NgwokeDepartment Human Kinetics and Health Education, University of Nigeria, Nsukka, P.M.B. 410001, Enugu State.
Chiedu EseadiDepartment of Educational Foundations.ORCID 0000-0003-1711-7558
Christian Iheanacho AgbotiDepartment of Sociology/Criminology and Security Studies, Alex-Ekwueme Federal University Ndufu Alike Ikwo, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
Chinedozie UwakweDepartment of Arts Education.
Benedict C EzeDepartment of Arts Education.
S.P.E.C.I.E.S. · USUniversity of Nigeria · NGFunai Electric (Japan) · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

objectiveHearing impaired students still face stigmatization and marginalization especially in inclusive classrooms in developing regions. This negatively impacts their school engagement. The present study aimed at ascertaining the effect of video-guided educational intervention on school engagement of hearing impaired students.

methodRandomized controlled trial design was adopted for the present study. A total of 46 junior secondary school students with hearing impairment and low school engagement symptoms participated in this study. The students were randomly assigned to groups - intervention group and care-as-usual control group. A video-guided educational intervention package which consists of 13-minutes captioned video clips with school engagement themes served as the treatment intervention. Data were collected at 3 different times (pre-test, post-test and follow up) using School Engagement Scale created by Fredericks, Blumenfeld, Friedel and Paris (2005). Data were analyzed using independent sample t-test, paired sample t-test, Cohen d and Chi-square.

resultsResults showed that the video-guided educational intervention significantly improved school engagement level among hearing impaired adolescent students in the intervention group in comparison with the students in the care-as-usual control group as measured by the Student Engagement Scale [Behavioral: t(24) = -9.305, P < .001; Emotional: t(24) = -7.772, P < .001; Cognitive: t(24) = -7.330 P < .001) as well as total student engagement (t(24) = 12.022, P < .001, Δ = 5.362). Also, the students who took part in the video-guided educational intervention maintained improved school engagement at follow-up.

conclusionVideo-guided educational intervention is an effective intervention for improving school engagement of hearing impaired adolescent students. Since acquiring relevant education is essential for leading a quality life especially among the special needs population, it was recommended that students with hearing impairment should be helped to acquire life skills through education by fostering their school engagement.

Indexed as

Video RecordingAcademic PerformanceAdolescentChildEducation of Persons with Hearing DisabilitiesFemaleHumansMaleNigeriaPhysical Education and TrainingSchoolsSocial ParticipationStudents

Identifiers

PMID32502050
PMCPMC7306343
OpenAlexW3033648073

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.