Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32501964›Full record

SynthesisMedicine2020

A comparison between perpendicular and parallel plating methods for distal humerus fractures: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Xiaohan Wang, Guoyan Liu

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intra-articular Distal Humerus Fractures: Parallel Versus Orthogonal Plating.HSS journal : the musculoskeletal journal of Hospital for Special Surgery · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Xiaohan WangDepartment of Orthopedics, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine Third Affiliated Hospital, Beijing.
Guoyan LiuDepartment of Orthopedics, Affiliated Hospital of Shandong University of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shandong, China.
Beijing University of Chinese Medicine · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the clinical outcomes of perpendicular and parallel plating for the treatment of distal humerus fractures.

methodsTwo investigators independently searched PubMed, OVID, and ScienceDirect databases prior to April 2019, without any limitations on language or publication status. The outcomes were union time, range of motion of elbow, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, and postoperative complications. Two authors independently performed a methodological quality and risk of bias assessment using Cochrane collaboration's tool. Data analysis was performed with STATA version 13.0.

resultsSix randomized controlled trials with 305 participants were included. The present meta-analysis indicated that orthogonal plating was associated with a longer union time compared with parallel plating. There were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding Elbow function, Mayo Elbow Performance Score, operation time, reduction quality, or postoperative complications.

conclusionBoth parallel plating and orthogonal plating are considered to be effective methods when treating distal humerus fractures. The results of this study found that parallel plating is superior to orthogonal plating in humerus fracture healing.

Indexed as

Bone PlatesFracture Fixation, InternalFracture HealingHumansHumeral FracturesOperative TimePostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of Function

Identifiers

PMID32501964
PMCPMC7306383
OpenAlexW3033661364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.