Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32501806›Full record

ArticleJMIR public health and surveillance2020

Fluctuation of Public Interest in COVID-19 in the United States: Retrospective Analysis of Google Trends Search Data.

Iltifat Husain, Blake Briggs, Cedric Lefebvre, David M Cline, Jason P Stopyra, Mary Claire O'Brien, Ramupriya Vaithi, Scott Gilmore, Chase Countryman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR public health and surveillance, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
18.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Google searches for bruxism, teeth grinding, and teeth clenching during the COVID-19 pandemic.Journal of orofacial orthopedics = Fortschritte der Kieferorthopadie : Organ/official journal Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Kieferorthopadie · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. High variability in model performance of Google relative search volumes in spatially clustered COVID-19 areas of the USA.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Iltifat HusainSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9465-4931
Blake BriggsSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5524-3291
Cedric LefebvreSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-0501-3057
David M ClineSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-2144-9371
Jason P StopyraSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-7457-3969
Mary Claire O'BrienSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-0957-4938
Ramupriya VaithiSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9694-2099
Scott GilmoreTuba City Regional Healthcare, Tuba City, AZ, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-3797-3167
Chase CountrymanSchool of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3015-4516
Wake Forest University · USTuba City Regional Health Care · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the absence of vaccines and established treatments, nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) are fundamental tools to control coronavirus disease (COVID-19) transmission. NPIs require public interest to be successful. In the United States, there is a lack of published research on the factors that influence public interest in COVID-19. Using Google Trends, we examined the US level of public interest in COVID-19 and how it correlated to testing and with other countries.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to determine how public interest in COVID-19 in the United States changed over time and the key factors that drove this change, such as testing. US public interest in COVID-19 was compared to that in countries that have been more successful in their containment and mitigation strategies.

methodsIn this retrospective study, Google Trends was used to analyze the volume of internet searches within the United States relating to COVID-19, focusing on dates between December 31, 2019, and March 24, 2020. The volume of internet searches related to COVID-19 was compared to that in other countries.

resultsThroughout January and February 2020, there was limited search interest in COVID-19 within the United States. Interest declined for the first 21 days of February. A similar decline was seen in geographical regions that were later found to be experiencing undetected community transmission in February. Between March 9 and March 12, 2020, there was a rapid rise in search interest. This rise in search interest was positively correlated with the rise of positive tests for SARS-CoV-2 (6.3, 95% CI -2.9 to 9.7; P<.001). Within the United States, it took 52 days for search interest to rise substantially after the first positive case; in countries with more successful outbreak control, search interest rose in less than 15 days.

conclusionsContainment and mitigation strategies require public interest to be successful. The initial level of COVID-19 public interest in the United States was limited and even decreased during a time when containment and mitigation strategies were being established. A lack of public interest in COVID-19 existed in the United States when containment and mitigation policies were in place. Based on our analysis, it is clear that US policy makers need to develop novel methods of communicating COVID-19 public health initiatives.

Indexed as

Public OpinionClinical Laboratory TechniquesCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 TestingCross-Cultural ComparisonHumansPandemicsPneumonia, ViralRetrospective StudiesSearch EngineUnited StatesCOVID-19digital healthGoogle TrendsInfodemiologyinternetpublic healthSARS-CoV-2trend

Identifiers

PMID32501806
PMCPMC7371405
OpenAlexW3033934096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.