Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32501533›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of haematology2020

The role of high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplant in multiple myeloma: is it time for a paradigm shift?

Dickran Kazandjian, Clifton C Mo, Ola Landgren, Paul G Richardson

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of haematology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dickran KazandjianMultiple Myeloma Program, Lymphoid Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6593-0917
Clifton C MoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8190-2484
Ola LandgrenMyeloma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6485-4839
Paul G RichardsonDepartment of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Jerome Lipper Multiple Myeloma Center, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7426-8865
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USNational Institutes of Health · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748RJ Corman Multiple Myeloma Research Fund
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advances in multiple myeloma include numerous approvals of novel therapies with unprecedented efficacy, a rapid and sustained tempo of new drug development, and further refinements to prognostication to include minimal residual disease (MRD) testing and improved risk stratification. The upfront use of immunomodulatory drug and proteasome inhibitor combinations followed by maintenance has resulted in transformative clinical benefit. Four-drug regimens incorporating monoclonal antibodies are reporting unprecedented rates of complete response and MRD negativity in the absence of intensification. In the context of these advances, the added value of high-dose melphalan with autologous stem-cell transplant (HDM-ASCT) is a key question. From a safety standpoint, HDM-ASCT is associated with both acute toxicities that reduce quality of life and long-term toxicities that may limit life expectancy for some patients. The present review discusses the recent advances in induction therapy, the impact of these advances on HDM-ASCT, the evolving role of MRD testing and the short- and long-term risks of HDM-ASCT. Recognising that prospective data remains limited, we suggest that HDM-ASCT not be considered mandatory for eligible newly diagnosed patients who are treated with highly efficacious regimens and achieve deep responses, but rather be held in reserve without early exposure to the clinical and genomic toxicity inherent to this approach.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansImmunologic FactorsMelphalanMultiple MyelomaNeoplasm, ResidualProteasome InhibitorsTransplantation, AutologousImmunologic FactorsMelphalanProteasome Inhibitorsautologous stem cell transplanthigh-dose melphalanmultiple myeloma

Identifiers

PMID32501533
PMCPMC8505046
OpenAlexW3033738548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.