Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32501511›Full record

ArticleJAMA pediatrics2020

Simulated Assessment of Pharmacokinetically Guided Dosing for Investigational Treatments of Pediatric Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.

Anil R Maharaj, Huali Wu, Christoph P Hornik, Stephen J Balevic, Chi D Hornik, P Brian Smith, Daniel Gonzalez, Kanecia O Zimmerman, Daniel K Benjamin, Michael Cohen-Wolkowiez and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA pediatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
6.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. A comparison of different methods for the first-in-pediatric dose selection.Journal of clinical and translational research · 2022
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Comparison of antiviral effect for mild-to-moderate COVID-19 cases between lopinavir/ritonavir versus hydroxychloroquine: A nationwide propensity score-matched cohort study.International journal of infectious diseases : IJID : official publication of the International Society for Infectious Diseases · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. A Narrative Review of Emerging Therapeutics for COVID-19.Mayo Clinic proceedings. Innovations, quality & outcomes · 2020
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anil R MaharajDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Huali WuDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Christoph P HornikDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Stephen J BalevicDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Chi D HornikDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
P Brian SmithDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel GonzalezUniversity of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Kanecia O ZimmermanDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Daniel K BenjaminDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Michael Cohen-WolkowiezDuke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina.
Best Pharmaceuticals for Children Act–Pediatric Trials Network Steering Committee
Clinical Research Institute · USDuke University · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Mentoring in Clinical Pharmacology and Early Phase TrialsK24AI143971 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI COHEN-WOLKOWIEZ, MICHAEL · 2019 to 2023
$895k
Optimal Dosing for Biologic Agents in Obese Patients with Rheumatoid and Juvenile ArthritisK23AR075874 · NIAMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI BALEVIC, STEPHEN JOSEPH · 2020 to 2024
$830k
NIAID NIH HHS K24 AI143971NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR075874
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Children of all ages appear susceptible to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 infection. To support pediatric clinical studies for investigational treatments of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), pediatric-specific dosing is required. Objective: To define pediatric-specific dosing regimens for hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir for COVID-19 treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: Pharmacokinetic modeling and simulation were used to extrapolate investigated adult dosages toward children (March 2020-April 2020). Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling was used to inform pediatric dosing for hydroxychloroquine. For remdesivir, pediatric dosages were derived using allometric-scaling with age-dependent exponents. Dosing simulations were conducted using simulated pediatric and adult participants based on the demographics of a white US population. Interventions: Simulated drug exposures following a 5-day course of hydroxychloroquine (400 mg every 12 hours × 2 doses followed by 200 mg every 12 hours × 8 doses) and a single 200-mg intravenous dose of remdesivir were computed for simulated adult participants. A simulation-based dose-ranging study was conducted in simulated children exploring different absolute and weight-normalized dosing strategies. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome for hydroxychloroquine was average unbound plasma concentrations for 5 treatment days. Additionally, unbound interstitial lung concentrations were simulated. For remdesivir, the primary outcome was plasma exposure (area under the curve, 0 to infinity) following single-dose administration. Results: For hydroxychloroquine, the physiologically based pharmacokinetic model analysis included 500 and 600 simulated white adult and pediatric participants, respectively, and supported weight-normalized dosing for children weighing less than 50 kg. Geometric mean-simulated average unbound plasma concentration values among children within different developmental age groups (32-35 ng/mL) were congruent to adults (32 ng/mL). Simulated unbound hydroxychloroquine concentrations in lung interstitial fluid mirrored those in unbound plasma and were notably lower than in vitro concentrations needed to mediate antiviral activity. For remdesivir, the analysis included 1000 and 6000 simulated adult and pediatric participants, respectively. The proposed pediatric dosing strategy supported weight-normalized dosing for participants weighing less than 60 kg. Geometric mean-simulated plasma area under the time curve 0 to infinity values among children within different developmental age-groups (4315-5027 ng × h/mL) were similar to adults (4398 ng × h/mL). Conclusions and Relevance: This analysis provides pediatric-specific dosing suggestions for hydroxychloroquine and remdesivir and raises concerns regarding hydroxychloroquine use for COVID-19 treatment because concentrations were less than those needed to mediate an antiviral effect.

Indexed as

Adenosine MonophosphateAdolescentAdultAlanineAntiviral AgentsChildChild, PreschoolCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentDrug Administration ScheduleDrug Dosage CalculationsFemaleHumansHydroxychloroquineInfantAdenosine MonophosphateAlanineAntiviral AgentsHydroxychloroquineremdesivir

Identifiers

PMID32501511
PMCPMC7275264
OpenAlexW3032919741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.