Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32501432›Full record

ArticleJournal of biosafety and biosecurity2019

Networking for training Level 3/4 biosafety laboratory staff.

Yi Huang, Jicheng Huang, Han Xia, Yongxia Shi, Haixia Ma, Zhiming Yuan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biosafety and biosecurity, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 54% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yi HuangNational Biosafety (Level 4) Laboratory in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 430200, China.
Jicheng HuangGuangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center, Guangzhou, 510700, China.
Han XiaNational Biosafety (Level 4) Laboratory in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 430200, China.
Yongxia ShiGuangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center, Guangzhou, 510700, China.
Haixia MaNational Biosafety (Level 4) Laboratory in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 430200, China.
Zhiming YuanNational Biosafety (Level 4) Laboratory in Wuhan, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 430200, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNGuangdong Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center (China) · CNWuhan Institute of Virology · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Worldwide, public health systems are continually challenged by emerging and re-emerging viruses. It is therefore important that high-containment labs coordinate and communicate globally to share their experiences and lessons to improve their capacity to respond to threats. The National Biosafety (Level 4) Laboratory in Wuhan, CAS, which is the first Level 4 biosafety laboratory (BSL-4) in China, has been certified recently and it is expected to play an important role in the prevention and control of highly infectious agents in future. Trained and experienced staff in such organizations is the most important factor contributing to safety and security. Therefore, it is imperative to develop a standard training program. Accordingly, in the present study, we developed an improved training program and assessment system based on policies and practices developed by BSL-3/4s in other countries. It included the following three components: (1) A flexible modularized theoretical training: This training comprised 14 modularized theoretical topics such that staffs with different backgrounds could take this theoretical training with different topic combinations according to their knowledge and skill levels; (2) A standardized practical training assessment: This comprehensive assessment, which could be used with biosafety laboratory staff before, during, and after training, included standard operation procedures to meet the special requirements of trainees with different scores; and (3) An applicable documentation system: A certification system was established to evaluate the ability of all staff working inside or outside the laboratory, implemented by a special committee. This certification was approved and authorized by the director of the laboratory and was classified into three grades with corresponding minimal requirements. Further, the present study examined the importance of and need for networking for training BSL-3/4 staff. The establishment of rigorous standards for training BSL-3/4 staff will instill confidence in the public, policy makers, and security officials. Additionally, the expanded international network of BSL-3/4s will continue to be operated safely and will pose no risk to scientific staff, local communities, surrounding environment, and host nations. The clarification and coordination of training standards will help develop a highly-qualified biocontainment workforce and will result in a series of programs that will enable scientists to develop measures to deal with existing threat agents and new diseases that emerge.

Indexed as

Biosafety training programLevel 3/4 biosafety laboratoryNetworking

Identifiers

PMID32501432
PMCPMC7148652
OpenAlexW2917477136

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.