Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32501418›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR2020

The emergency reaction questionnaire - First steps towards a new method.

Andras N Zsido, Krisztina Csokasi, Orsolya Vincze, Carlos M Coelho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of disaster risk reduction : IJDRR, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Reducing Amniocentesis Anxiety: The Role of Pre-Procedural Video Information.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Andras N ZsidoInstitute of Psychology, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Krisztina CsokasiInstitute of Psychology, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Orsolya VinczeInstitute of Psychology, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Carlos M CoelhoSchool pf Psychology, ISMAI University Institute of Maia, Portugal.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During emergencies, people are more or less capable of performing adequately. Knowledge about human behavior while facing emergencies has become more significant nowadays. This knowledge can help improving our already present defensive responses and natural coping mechanisms when facing imminent dangers, natural disasters, and catastrophes. A new method is here offered to explore the core points of this topic. The Emergency Reaction Questionnaire (ERQ), is proposed for predicting one's reaction and behaviour in an emergency. First, a large item pool was created based on interviews with people facing emergencies on a weekly basis and related literature. The factor structure, reliability and validity were assessed on a large sample of lay people (N = 1115, 440 males) and specific groups of firefighters and people doing extreme sports (N = 85, all males). Participants were Caucasian with an age range of 18-70. We also used measures of anxiety, depression, and sensation seeking, behavioral inhibition and activation and coping in stressful situations. The ERQ was proved to be reliable and consistent in time and having sound psychometric properties both on the community and special samples. Results show that psychometric properties are satisfying; the test has excellent validity ratings. Consequently, the ERQ can be used in future research effectively and facilitate a better understanding of how people react in a highly dangerous situation. Future directions in the utilization of the new method are discussed.

Indexed as

Dangerous professionDefensive systemDisaster preparednessEmergency reactionQuestionnaire developmentSensation seekers

Identifiers

PMID32501418
PMCPMC7243776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.