ArticleLupus2020
Fatigue in adults with primary antiphospholipid syndrome: findings from a mixed-methods study.
Article in Lupus, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Health Information-seeking Behavior in Patients with Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Scoping Review with Original Data.Current rheumatology reports · 2026Review
- A qualitative investigation of the experiences of patients living with antiphospholipid antibodies.Lupus · 2024Article
- Connecting the dots: the role of fatigue in female infertility.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2024Review
- Article
- Predictors and Interrelationship of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Antiphospholipid Syndrome: A Cross-Sectional Study.ACR open rheumatology · 2023Article
- The experiences and acceptability of a novel multimodal programme for the management of fibromyalgia: A qualitative service evaluation.Musculoskeletal care · 2022Article
- Fatigue in early rheumatoid arthritis: data from the Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Network.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to explore the experience and impact of fatigue in adults with primary antiphospholipid syndrome (pAPS).
methodsThis sequential, explanatory mixed-methods study enrolled adults with a six-month or more history of pAPS. Consenting participants completed the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue subscale (FS), Multi-Dimensional Perceived Social Support Scale, Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQMETS). Relationships between FS and other variables were explored with multiple linear regression. Interviews were conducted with a subgroup of participants, and the data were analysed thematically.
resultsA total of 103 participants were recruited (
conclusionFatigue was a common symptom of pAPS and challenging to manage. Other factors, particularly mood and physical activity, influenced fatigue. Evidence-based self-management interventions are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.