Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32500896›Full record

ArticleLab on a chip2020

High-throughput screening by droplet microfluidics: perspective into key challenges and future prospects.

Emory M Payne, Daniel A Holland-Moritz, Shuwen Sun, Robert T Kennedy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Lab on a chip, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. LFC-Lab on a chip · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Accelerating countermeasure candidate discovery for A-series chemical warfare agent exposure.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emory M PayneDepartment of Chemistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. rtkenn@umich.edu.
Daniel A Holland-Moritz
Shuwen Sun
Robert T Kennedy

Funding

Microfluidics in Biomedical Sciences Training ProgramT32EB005582 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI FAN, XUDONG · 2005 to 2020
$3.9M
NIBIB NIH HHS T32 EB005582
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In two decades of development, impressive strides have been made for automating basic laboratory operations in droplet-based microfluidics, allowing the emergence of a new form of high-throughput screening and experimentation in nanoliter to femtoliter volumes. Despite advancements in droplet storage, manipulation, and analysis, the field has not yet been widely adapted for many high-throughput screening (HTS) applications. Broad adoption and commercial development of these techniques require robust implementation of strategies for the stable storage, chemical containment, generation of libraries, sample tracking, and chemical analysis of these small samples. We discuss these challenges for implementing droplet HTS and highlight key strategies that have begun to address these concerns. Recent advances in the field leave us optimistic about the future prospects of this rapidly developing technology.

Identifiers

PMID32500896
PMCPMC12183681

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.