SynthesisJournal of the American Heart Association2020
Potassium Intake and Blood Pressure: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Synthesis in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 145 papers, 21 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
145 citing papers in PubMed, 21 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 246 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sodium and potassium intake in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review of clinical studies with implications for disease-related outcomes.Rheumatology international · 2026Pooled it
- Magnesium Supplementation and Blood Pressure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2025Pooled it
- Whole grain and refined grain consumption and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.Scientific reports · 2025Pooled it
- Dietary patterns and hypertension in Chinese adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Investigation and management of resistant hypertension: British and Irish Hypertension Society position statement.Journal of human hypertension · 2025Guideline
- [Cardiovascular preventive recommendations. PAPPS 2024 thematic updates].Atencion primaria · 2024Guideline
- Pooled it
- Dietary interventions in the management of atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Alcohol Intake and Blood Pressure Levels: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Nonexperimental Cohort Studies.Hypertension (Dallas, Tex. : 1979) · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Fruit and vegetable consumption and the risk of hypertension: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies.European journal of nutrition · 2023Pooled it
- Association Between Omega-3 Fatty Acid Intake and Dyslipidemia: A Continuous Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2023Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Effect of Potassium Supplementation on Endothelial Function: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies.Nutrients · 2023Pooled it
- Fructose-containing food sources and blood pressure: A systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials.PloS one · 2023Pooled it
- Environmental and lifestyle risk factors for early-onset dementia: a systematic review.Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis · 2022Pooled it
- Dietary Potassium Intake and Risk of Diabetes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies.Nutrients · 2022Pooled it
- Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Intake and Blood Pressure: A Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2022Pooled it
- Blood Pressure Effects of Sodium Reduction: Dose-Response Meta-Analysis of Experimental Studies.Circulation · 2021Pooled it
- Sodium and Potassium Intake and Cardiovascular Disease in Older People: A Systematic Review.Nutrients · 2020Pooled it
85 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Epidemiologic studies, including trials, suggest an association between potassium intake and blood pressure (BP). However, the strength and shape of this relationship is uncertain. Methods and Results We performed a meta-analysis to explore the dose-response relationship between potassium supplementation and BP in randomized-controlled trials with a duration ≥4 weeks using the recently developed 1-stage cubic spline regression model. This model allows use of trials with at least 2 exposure categories. We identified 32 eligible trials. Most were conducted in adults with hypertension using a crossover design and potassium supplementation doses that ranged from 30 to 140 mmol/d. We observed a U-shaped relationship between 24-hour active and control arm differences in potassium excretion and BP levels, with weakening of the BP reduction effect above differences of 30 mmol/d and a BP increase above differences ≈80 mmol/d. Achieved potassium excretion analysis also identified a U-shaped relationship. The BP-lowering effects of potassium supplementation were stronger in participants with hypertension and at higher levels of sodium intake. The BP increase with high potassium excretion was noted in participants with antihypertensive drug-treated hypertension but not in their untreated counterparts. Conclusions We identified a nonlinear relationship between potassium intake and both systolic and diastolic BP, although estimates for BP effects of high potassium intakes should be interpreted with caution because of limited availability of trials. Our findings indicate an adequate intake of potassium is desirable to achieve a lower BP level but suggest excessive potassium supplementation should be avoided, particularly in specific subgroups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.