Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32500620›Full record

Observational studyPM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation2021

Cellular and Clinical Analyses of Autologous Bone Marrow Aspirate Injectate for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Pilot Study.

Kristina Wells, Michael Klein, Nicole Hurwitz, Kristen Santiago, Jennifer Cheng, Zafir Abutalib, Nicholas Beatty, Gregory Lutz

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Adipose-derived and bone marrow aspirate concentrate injections for osteoarthritis: A scoping review.PM & R : the journal of injury, function, and rehabilitation · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Kristina WellsDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Cornell University College of Veterinary Medicine, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Michael KleinDepartment of Pathology, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Nicole HurwitzDepartment of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Kristen SantiagoDepartment of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Jennifer ChengDepartment of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8458-619X
Zafir AbutalibBiostatistics Core, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Nicholas BeattyDepartment of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.
Gregory LutzDepartment of Physiatry, Hospital for Special Surgery, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4538-563X
Hospital for Special Surgery · USCornell University · US

Funding

Disparities in COVID Disease Severity and Outcomes in New York CityUL1TR002384 · NCATS · WEILL MEDICAL COLL OF CORNELL UNIV · PI JULIANNE L IMPERATO-MCGINLEY · 2017 to 2026
$86.2M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002384NIH HHS UL1TR002384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionKnee osteoarthritis (OA) is characterized by pain and functional deficits. Common conservative strategies include medications, physical therapy, and intra-articular injections. Recently, treatment using autologous cell injections has increased.

objectiveTo characterize the cellular content of bone marrow aspirate (BMA) and to evaluate the effect of intra-articular autologous BMA injections in patients with mild knee OA.

designProspective pilot observational study.

settingAcademic institution. PATIENTS: Eleven patients with unilateral or bilateral mild knee OA (15 knees) were included in the cellular analysis. Ten patients (13 knees) were included in the overall (cellular and clinical) analysis.

interventionsBMA was aspirated from patients' iliac crests and then injected intra-articularly under fluoroscopic and/or ultrasound guidance. BMA samples were analyzed using flow cytometry, colony forming unit (CFU) assays, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Questionnaires assessing pain and function were administered preinjection and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postinjection. Side effects and satisfaction were assessed.

main outcome measuresTotal nucleated cell (TNC) concentration, mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) concentration, CFU count, and interleukin-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra) concentration.

resultsBMA sample analyses revealed wide ranges in TNC concentration (173300-4 491 050 cells/mL), MSC concentration (0-500 cells/mL), CFUs (0-19), and IL-1Ra concentration (2806-29 394 pg/mL). Improvements in Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcomes Score for Joint Replacement were observed throughout the 12-month follow-up period (F[4,12] = 12.29, P < .001). Additionally, current, usual, best, and worst numerical rating scale pain scores significantly decreased over time (P < .001). Patient satisfaction was high (range: 8.1 ± 2.1-8.8 ± 1.9), and side effects were uncommon.

conclusionsThe cellular content of BMA samples varied widely between patients and was lower than the anticipated yield reported by the device's manufacturer. However, intra-articular BMA injections for knee OA in a small pilot cohort appeared to be safe with potential therapeutic value. Larger, prospective, double-blinded studies are warranted.

Indexed as

Osteoarthritis, KneeBone MarrowHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID32500620
PMCPMC8363189
OpenAlexW3033760177

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.