ArticleGlobal change biology2020
Global human influence maps reveal clear opportunities in conserving Earth's remaining intact terrestrial ecosystems.
Article in Global change biology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed.
- National human footprint maps for Peru and Ecuador.Scientific data · 2025Article
- Global scale assessment of the human-induced extinction crisis of terrestrial carnivores.Science advances · 2025Article
- No compromise in efficiency from the co-application of a marine and a terrestrial CDR method.Nature communications · 2025Article
- Effects of Urbanization on Ventral Patch Size and Phenotypic Correlates of Patch Expression in Male Western Fence Lizards (Ecology and evolution · 2025Article
- Temperature overshoot responses to ambitious forestation in an Earth System Model.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Mapping global land conversion pressure to support conservation planning.Scientific data · 2024Article
- Human disturbance increases spatiotemporal associations among mountain forest terrestrial mammal species.eLife · 2024Article
- Lessons from Ethiopian coffee landscapes for global conservation in a post-wild world.Communications biology · 2024Review
- Small Felids Coexist in Mixed-Use Landscape in the Bolivian Amazon.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024Article
- Mapping the planet's critical areas for biodiversity and nature's contributions to people.Nature communications · 2024Article
- A vision for incorporating human mobility in the study of human-wildlife interactions.Nature ecology & evolution · 2023Review
- Global determinants of insect mitochondrial genetic diversity.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Built structures influence patterns of energy demand and CONature communications · 2023Article
- Human appropriation of net primary production as driver of change in landscape-scale vertebrate richness.Global ecology and biogeography : a journal of macroecology · 2023Article
- Biological soil crusts decrease infiltration but increase erosion resistance in a human-disturbed tropical dry forest.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Article
- Improving protected area effectiveness through consideration of different human-pressure baselines.Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology · 2022Article
- Habitat patches providing south-north connectivity are under-protected in a fragmented landscape.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Spatial-temporal variations in deforestation hotspots in Sumatra and Kalimantan from 2001-2018.Ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Global tropical dry forest extent and cover: A comparative study of bioclimatic definitions using two climatic data sets.PloS one · 2021Article
- Cost-effective priorities for the expansion of global terrestrial protected areas: Setting post-2020 global and national targets.Science advances · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Leading up to the Convention on Biological Diversity Conference of the Parties 15, there is momentum around setting bold conservation targets. Yet, it remains unclear how much of Earth's land area remains without significant human influence and where this land is located. We compare four recent global maps of human influences across Earth's land, Anthromes, Global Human Modification, Human Footprint and Low Impact Areas, to answer these questions. Despite using various methodologies and data, these different spatial assessments independently estimate similar percentages of the Earth's terrestrial surface as having very low (20%-34%) and low (48%-56%) human influence. Three out of four spatial assessments agree on 46% of the non-permanent ice- or snow-covered land as having low human influence. However, much of the very low and low influence portions of the planet are comprised of cold (e.g., boreal forests, montane grasslands and tundra) or arid (e.g., deserts) landscapes. Only four biomes (boreal forests, deserts, temperate coniferous forests and tundra) have a majority of datasets agreeing that at least half of their area has very low human influence. More concerning, <1% of temperate grasslands, tropical coniferous forests and tropical dry forests have very low human influence across most datasets, and tropical grasslands, mangroves and montane grasslands also have <1% of land identified as very low influence across all datasets. These findings suggest that about half of Earth's terrestrial surface has relatively low human influence and offers opportunities for proactive conservation actions to retain the last intact ecosystems on the planet. However, though the relative abundance of ecosystem areas with low human influence varies widely by biome, conserving these last intact areas should be a high priority before they are completely lost.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.