ArticleEnvironmental science and pollution research international2020
Assessing the integration of solar power projects: SWOT-based AHP-F-TOPSIS case study of Turkey.
Article in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intermodal travel planning and decision support integrated with transportation and energy systems.Heliyon · 2024Article
- How financial development affects green energy finance? Relationship between environmental regulation and economic performance.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Effect of climate change to solar energy potential: a case study in the Eastern Anatolia Region of Turkey.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2022Article
- Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis.Environment, development and sustainability · 2022Review
- Factors Determining Suitable Landfill Sites for Energy Generation from Municipal Solid Waste: A Case Study of Jabodetabek Area, Indonesia.TheScientificWorldJournal · 2022Article
- Article
- Does the combining effects of energy and consideration of financial development lead to environmental burden: social perspective of energy finance?Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Urban and Rural Population and Development Research on Medical Coordination: In View of Dalian 2008-2017 Official Statistics.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- Trilemma association of energy consumption, carbon emission, and economic growth of BRICS and OECD regions: quantile regression estimation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Managerial policy and economic analysis of wind-generated renewable hydrogen for light-duty vehicles: Green solution of energy crises.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Globalization, sustainable development, and variation in cost of power plant technologies: A perspective of developing economies.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Assessing the perceived impact of exploration and production of hydrocarbons on households perspective of environmental regulation in Ghana.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
- Assessing energy security in Africa based on multi-dimensional approach of principal composite analysis.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Solar energy systems are a cheaper and easy solution to cope with severe energy crisis especially in emerging economies including Turkey which exerted huge efforts to enhance the existing solar power projects. However, the selection of the optimal site for the installation of solar projects needs vigorous investigation through various factors. Adequate quantitative scientific research is required for the process of site selection in Turkey. This paper categorizes various sites in Turkey through various factors such as economic, environmental, and social factors. Various major criteria have been combined through mathematical development to install the solar power project in remote areas of Turkey. The scientific evaluation of remote and rural solar projects in Turkey has been taken as a case study in the current paper. Additionally, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and F-VIKOR methods were used to aggregate the criteria. The results show that economic and social ratio is significant, whereas the transmission matrix, land cost, and the sun irradiance got a major score in order to generate electricity. The study results show that total sunshine time per year determined is 2741 h (a total of 7.5 h per day) and the total solar energy obtained each year is 1527 kWh per square meter per year (a total of 4.18 kWh per square meter per day).
Indexed as
Identifiers
32500502What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.