Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32500450›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2020

Evaluation of a marker-less, intra-operative, augmented reality guidance system for robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy.

Megha Kalia, Prateek Mathur, Keith Tsang, Peter Black, Nassir Navab, Septimiu Salcudean

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. A deep learning framework for real-time 3D model registration in robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Megha Kalia *Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. mkalia@ece.ubc.ca.
Prateek Mathur *Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada. pmathur@ece.ubc.ca.
Keith TsangElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
Peter BlackVancouver Prostate Centre, Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
Nassir NavabComputer Aided Medical Procedures, Technical University of Munich, Boltzmannstraße 15, 85748, Garching bei München, Germany.
Septimiu SalcudeanElectrical and Computer Engineering, University of British Columbia, 2329 West Mall, Vancouver, BC, V6T 1Z4, Canada.
University of British Columbia · CATechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

Canadian Network for Research and Innovation in Machining Technology, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada STPGP 494392-16
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRobot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALRP) using the da Vinci surgical robot is a common treatment for organ-confined prostate cancer. Augmented reality (AR) can help during RALRP by showing the surgeon the location of anatomical structures and tumors from preoperative imaging. Previously, we proposed hand-eye and camera intrinsic matrix estimation procedures that can be carried out with conventional instruments within the patient during surgery, take < 3 min to perform, and fit seamlessly in the existing surgical workflow. In this paper, we describe and evaluate a complete AR guidance system for RALRP and quantify its accuracy.

methodsOur AR system requires three transformations: the transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) to da Vinci transformation, the camera intrinsic matrix, and the hand-eye transformation. For evaluation, a 3D-printed cross-wire was visualized in TRUS and stereo endoscope in a water bath. Manually triangulated cross-wire points from stereo images were used as ground truth to evaluate overall TRE between these points and points transformed from TRUS to camera.

resultsAfter transforming the ground-truth points from the TRUS to the camera coordinate frame, the mean target registration error (TRE) (SD) was [Formula: see text] mm. The mean TREs (SD) in the x-, y-, and z-directions are [Formula: see text] mm, [Formula: see text] mm, and [Formula: see text] mm, respectively.

conclusionsWe describe and evaluate a complete AR guidance system for RALRP which can augment preoperative data to endoscope camera image, after a deformable magnetic resonance image to TRUS registration step. The streamlined procedures with current surgical workflow and low TRE demonstrate the compatibility and readiness of the system for clinical translation. A detailed sensitivity study remains part of future work.

Indexed as

Augmented RealityHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalLaparoscopyMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstatectomyProstatic NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresSurgery, Computer-AssistedUltrasonographyAugmented realityImage guided surgeryMedical imagingProstate surgeryRobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID32500450
OpenAlexW3033093543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.