ArticleCytotechnology2020
Automated in-process characterization and selection of cell-clones for quality and efficient cell manufacturing.
Article in Cytotechnology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of a modular robotic cluster matches skilled human operators for complex cell therapy manufacturing tasks.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Article
- A decade of innovation in healthcare: Automation, bio-printing and digital twin technologies for personalized therapies.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026Review
- Automated human induced pluripotent stem cell colony segmentation for use in cell culture automation applications.SLAS technology · 2023Article
- Automating iPSC generation to enable autologous photoreceptor cell replacement therapy.Journal of translational medicine · 2023Article
- Sensor technologies for quality control in engineered tissue manufacturing.Biofabrication · 2022Review
- Characterization of heterogeneous primary human cartilage-derived cell population using non-invasive live-cell phase-contrast time-lapse imaging.Cytotherapy · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Delivery of safe, effective and reliable cellular therapies, whether based on mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) or induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), demand standardization of cell culture protocols. There is a need to develop automation platform that enables the users to generate culture expanded human cell populations that improves the quality and reduces batch-to-batch variation with respect to biological potential. Cell X™ robot was designed to address these current challenges in the cell fabrication industry. It utilizes non-invasive large field of view quantitative image analysis to guide an automated process of targeted "biopsy" (cells or media), "picking" (selection) of desired cells or colonies, or "weeding" (removal) of undesired cells, thus providing an unprecedented ability to acquire quantitative measurement in a complex heterogeneous cell environment "in process" and then to act on those measurements to define highly reproducible methods for cell and colony "management" based on application specific critical quality attributes to improve the quality of the manufactured cell lines and cell products.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.