ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2020
Rectal gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on prostate diffusion-weighted MRI with epi read-out at 3.0 T: does a preparatory micro-enema improve image quality?
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.
- Anatomical zone and tissue type impacts the repeatability of quantitative MRI parameters and radiomic features for longitudinal monitoring of treatment response in the prostate.Magma (New York, N.Y.) · 2025Article
- Micro-enema immediately prior to prostate MRI: effects on rectal gas, image quality and PI-QUAL score.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
- Comparison of the impact of rectal susceptibility artifacts in prostate magnetic resonance imaging on subjective evaluation and deep learning: a two-center retrospective study.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Machine learning based prediction of image quality in prostate MRI using rapid localizer images.Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2024Article
- Addressing image misalignments in multi-parametric prostate MRI for enhanced computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Application of a validated prostate MRI deep learning system to independent same-vendor multi-institutional data: demonstration of transferability.European radiology · 2023Article
- Prostate MRI and image Quality: It is time to take stock.European journal of radiology · 2023Review
- State-of-the-art Prostate Imaging.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2023Review
- [Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v 2.1: Overview and Critical Points].Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2023Review
- Prostate MRI quality: a critical review of the last 5 years and the role of the PI-QUAL score.The British journal of radiology · 2022Review
- Convolutional Neural Networks for Automated Classification of Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging Based on Image Quality.Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI · 2022Article
- Multi-practice survey on MR imaging practice patterns in rectal cancer in the United States.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2022Article
- Understanding PI-QUAL for prostate MRI quality: a practical primer for radiologists.Insights into imaging · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byImaging.2022
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess whether the application of a preparatory micro-enema reduces gas-induced susceptibility artefacts on diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate.
methods114 consecutive patients who received multiparametric 3 T MRI of the prostate at our institution were retrospectively enrolled. 63 patients self-administered a preparatory micro-enema prior to imaging, and 51 patients underwent MRI without bowel preparation. Two blinded readers independently reviewed the diffusion-weighted sequences regarding gas-induced artefacts. The presence/severity of artefacts was scored ranging from 0 (no artefact) to 3 (severe artefact). A score ≥ 2 was considered a clinically relevant artefact. Maximum rectal width at the level of the prostate was correlated with the administration of a micro-enema. Scores were compared between the scans performed with and without bowel preparation using univariable and multivariable logistic regression, taking into account potential confounding factors (age and prostate volume).
resultsSignificantly less artefacts were found on diffusion-weighted sequences after the administration of a micro-enema shortly prior to MR imaging. Clinically relevant artefacts were found in 10% in the patient group after enema, in 41% without enema. If present, artefacts were also significantly less severe. Mean severity score was 0.3 (enema administered) and 1.2 (no enema), and odds ratio was 0.137 (p < 0.0001) in univariable ordinal logistic regression. Inter-observer agreement was excellent (κ 0.801).
conclusionThe use of a preparatory micro-enema prior to 3 T multiparametric prostate MRI significantly reduces both the incidence and severity of gas-induced artefacts on diffusion-weighted sequences and thus improves image quality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.