Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499943›Full record

ArticleBiomedical optics express2020

Development of a low-cost imaging system for remote mosquito surveillance.

Adam Goodwin, Margaret Glancey, Tristan Ford, Laura Scavo, Jewell Brey, Collyn Heier, Nicholas J Durr, Soumyadipta Acharya

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedical optics express, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Adam GoodwinCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Margaret GlanceyCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Tristan FordCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Laura ScavoCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Jewell BreyCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Collyn HeierCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Nicholas J DurrCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9808-7383
Soumyadipta AcharyaCenter for Bioengineering Innovation and Design, Biomedical Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, 3400 N Charles St., Baltimore, MD 21218, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted vector control strategies aiming to prevent mosquito borne disease are severely limited by the logistical burden of vector surveillance, the monitoring of an area to understand mosquito species composition, abundance and spatial distribution. We describe development of an imaging system within a mosquito trap to remotely identify caught mosquitoes, including selection of the image resolution requirement, a design to meet that specification, and evaluation of the system. The necessary trap image resolution was determined to be 16 lp/mm, or 31.25um. An optics system meeting these specifications was implemented in a BG-GAT mosquito trap. Its ability to provide images suitable for accurate specimen identification was evaluated by providing entomologists with images of individual specimens, taken either with a microscope or within the trap and asking them to provide a species identification, then comparing these results. No difference in identification accuracy between the microscope and the trap images was found; however, due to limitations of human species classification from a single image, the system is only able to provide accurate genus-level mosquito classification. Further integration of this system with machine learning computer vision algorithms has the potential to provide near-real time mosquito surveillance data at the species level.

Identifiers

PMID32499943
PMCPMC7249828
OpenAlexW3013441439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.