Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499783›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2020

Selection of Antibody Responses Associated With

Lotus L van den Hoogen, Gillian Stresman, Jacquelin Présumé, Ithamare Romilus, Gina Mondélus, Tamara Elismé, Alexandre Existe, Karen E S Hamre, Ruth A Ashton, Thomas Druetz and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Serology reveals comparable patterns in the transmission intensities ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Antibody levels to variant and conservedFrontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 6 institutions in 5 countries.

Lotus L van den HoogenDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Gillian StresmanDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Jacquelin PrésuméLaboratoire National de Santé Publique, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Ithamare RomilusLaboratoire National de Santé Publique, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Gina MondélusLaboratoire National de Santé Publique, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Tamara ElisméLaboratoire National de Santé Publique, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Alexandre ExisteLaboratoire National de Santé Publique, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Karen E S HamreMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Ruth A AshtonCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Thomas DruetzCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Vena JosephCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
James G BeesonBurnet Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Susheel K SinghDepartment of Congenital Disorders, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Jacques BoncyLaboratoire National de Santé Publique, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Thomas P EiseleCenter for Applied Malaria Research and Evaluation, Tulane University School of Public Health & Tropical Medicine, New Orleans, LA, United States.
Michelle A ChangMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Jean F LemoineMinistère de la Santé Publique et de la Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
Kevin K A TettehDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Eric RogierMalaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Chris DrakeleyDepartment of Infection Biology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Tulane University · USCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBStatens Serum Institut · DKUniversité de Montréal · CAUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In our aim to eliminate malaria, more sensitive tools to detect residual transmission are quickly becoming essential. Antimalarial antibody responses persist in the blood after a malaria infection and provide a wider window to detect exposure to infection compared to parasite detection metrics. Here, we aimed to select antibody responses associated with recent and cumulative exposure to malaria using cross-sectional survey data from Haiti, an elimination setting. Using a multiplex bead assay, we generated data for antibody responses (immunoglobulin G) to 23

Indexed as

Antibody FormationAdolescentAdultAge FactorsAntibodies, ProtozoanChildCross-Sectional StudiesDisease EradicationHaitiHumansImmunoglobulin GMalaria, FalciparumPlasmodium falciparumPrevalenceYoung AdultAntibodies, ProtozoanImmunoglobulin GeliminationETRAMPimmunoglobulin G (IgG)malariamultiplex bead assaysero-surveillance

Identifiers

PMID32499783
PMCPMC7243477
OpenAlexW3024714861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.