ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020
Experiential Neurorehabilitation: A Neurological Therapy Based on the Enactive Paradigm.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Executive Dysfunction-A Serious Game for Assessment in Real-Life Contexts: Development and Cross-Sectional Usability Study.JMIR serious games · 2026Article
- When the body resonates with the pain of the other: Empathy Bodyssence in Parkinson's disease.Neuroscience of consciousness · 2026Article
- From Social Robotics to Ecological Cognitive Care: An Enaction-Based Umbrella Review on Neurocognitive Disorders.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- The spectrum of embodied intersubjective synchrony in empathy: from fully embodied to externally oriented engagement in Parkinson's disease.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Unveiling the neuro-cognitive paradigm: a new approach to the treatment of anxiety: a comprehensive review.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2024Review
- "We can all relate": patient experience of an emotion-oriented group intervention after Acquired Brain Injury.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Article
- "I am feeling tension in my whole body": An experimental phenomenological study of empathy for pain.Frontiers in psychology · 2022Article
- Neuromechanical Biomarkers for Robotic Neurorehabilitation.Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2021Review
- The limitations and challenges in the assessment of executive dysfunction associated with real-world functioning: The opportunity of serious games.Applied neuropsychology. AdultReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the arrival of the cognitive paradigm during the latter half of the last century, the theoretical and scientific bases of neurorehabilitation have been linked to the knowledge developed in cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive neuroscience. Although the knowledge generated by these disciplines has made relevant contributions to neurological therapy, their theoretical premises may create limitations in therapeutic processes. The present manuscript has two main objectives: first, to explicitly set forth the theoretical bases of cognitive neurorehabilitation and critically analyze the repercussions that these premises have produced in clinical practice; and second, to propose the enactive paradigm to reinterpret perspectives on people with brain damage and their therapy (assessment and treatment). This analysis will show that (1) neurorehabilitation as a therapy underutilizes body-originated resources that aid in recovery from neurological sequelae (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.