Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2020

Psychometric Properties of a Simplified Chinese Version of the Secondary Trauma Questionnaire in a Potentially Traumatized Study Sample.

Ya-Jun Yan, Lichen Jiang, Mu-Li Hu, Ling Wang, Xin Xu, Zhi-Shuai Jin, Yu Song, Zhang-Xiu Lu, You-Qiao Chen, Na-Ni Li and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Ya-Jun YanMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Lichen JiangMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Mu-Li HuResearch and Social Office, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Ling WangResearch and Social Office, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Xin XuMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhi-Shuai JinMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Yu SongMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Zhang-Xiu LuMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
You-Qiao ChenMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Na-Ni LiDepartment of Science and Education, Zhuzhou 331 Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Jun SuDepartment of Science and Education, Zhuzhou 331 Hospital, Zhuzhou, China.
Da-Xing WuMedical Psychological Center, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.
Tao XiaoResearch and Social Office, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScreening for secondary traumatic stress (STS) is lacking in China. It is unclear whether Western models of STS can be adapted satisfactorily for use in non-Western regions. The 20-item Secondary Trauma Questionnaire (STQ) is a self-report measure of traumatic stress symptoms in individuals who have been influenced indirectly by suicide or violent injury of people important to the respondents.

methodsHere, we assessed the psychometric properties of a newly developed Chinese version of the STQ in a potentially traumatized sample (

resultsThe full scale demonstrated good internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.95-0.97), convergent validity, discriminant validity, and factorial validity. CFA affirmed a one-factor structure; the configural, metric, scalar, and strict invariances of the STQ were acceptable across genders.

conclusionThe present results indicate that the STQ is a reliable and valid self-report assessment for use with potentially traumatized people in China, and further supports the notion that the STQ is amenable to additional future cross-cultural adaptation.

Indexed as

assessmentmeasurementpsychometric propertiessecondary traumasecondary traumatic stress

Identifiers

PMID32499735
PMCPMC7244250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.