Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499729›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2020

Biomarkers in Psychiatry: Concept, Definition, Types and Relevance to the Clinical Reality.

Maria Salud García-Gutiérrez, Francisco Navarrete, Francisco Sala, Ani Gasparyan, Amaya Austrich-Olivares, Jorge Manzanares

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06138301 (Digital Interventions for Social isOLation In youThs And theIR familiEs), which is not on this map. Cited by 138 papers, 10 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
138citing papers in PubMed, 10 pooled it
25.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06138301 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Digital Interventions for Social isOLation In youThs And theIR familiEs

TypeinterventionalSponsorAzienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata VeronaRan2023 to 2025Enrolled80ConditionsSocial Isolation, Psychosocial ProblemArmsCognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT), Cognitive Remediation (CR)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

138 citing papers in PubMed, 10 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 306 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

78 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Maria Salud García-GutiérrezInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain.
Francisco NavarreteInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain.
Francisco SalaInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain.
Ani GasparyanInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain.
Amaya Austrich-OlivaresInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain.
Jorge ManzanaresInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad Miguel Hernández-CSIC, Alicante, Spain.
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx · ESInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During the last years, an extraordinary effort has been made to identify biomarkers as potential tools for improving prevention, diagnosis, drug response and drug development in psychiatric disorders. Contrary to other diseases, mental illnesses are classified by diagnostic categories with a broad variety list of symptoms. Consequently, patients diagnosed from the same psychiatric illness present a great heterogeneity in their clinical presentation. This fact together with the incomplete knowledge of the neurochemical alterations underlying mental disorders, contribute to the limited efficacy of current pharmacological options. In this respect, the identification of biomarkers in psychiatry is becoming essential to facilitate diagnosis through the developing of markers that allow to stratify groups within the syndrome, which in turn may lead to more focused treatment options. In order to shed light on this issue, this review summarizes the concept and types of biomarkers including an operational definition for therapeutic development. Besides, the advances in this field were summarized and sorted into five categories, which include genetics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenetics. While promising results were achieved, there is a lack of biomarker investigations especially related to treatment response to psychiatric conditions. This review includes a final conclusion remarking the future challenges required to reach the goal of developing valid, reliable and broadly-usable biomarkers for psychiatric disorders and their treatment. The identification of factors predicting treatment response will reduce trial-and-error switches of medications facilitating the discovery of new effective treatments, being a crucial step towards the establishment of greater personalized medicine.

Indexed as

biomarkerscentral biomarkerslymphocytesneuropsychiatryperipheral biomarkerspersonalized medicine

Identifiers

PMID32499729
PMCPMC7243207
OpenAlexW3024613351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.