ArticleNature2020
The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views.
Article in Nature, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 242 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
242 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 718 citations in OpenAlex.
- Drivers of health polarization during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.Science advances · 2025Pooled it
- COVID-19 vaccine acceptance among pregnant women worldwide: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PloS one · 2022Pooled it
- COVID-19 vaccination intention in the first year of the pandemic: A systematic review.Journal of clinical nursing · 2022Pooled it
- Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMJ open · 2021Pooled it
- Nudging toward vaccination: a systematic review.BMJ global health · 2021Pooled it
- Vaccination against COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis of acceptability and its predictors.Preventive medicine · 2021Pooled it
- Layperson and Healthcare Professional Experiences of Medical Misinformation About Masks on Social Media During the Covid-19 Pandemic: A Thematic Framework Analysis.Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy · 2026Article
- Leveraging Large Language Models to Address Common Vaccination Myths and Misconceptions.Vaccines · 2026Article
- Japanese-Language AI Agent System for Human Papillomavirus Vaccine Infoveillance and Public Communication: Development and Feasibility Evaluation.JMIR infodemiology · 2026Article
- Information Quality, Content Scope, and Audience Engagement of Popular Turkish Instagram Posts on Tooth Whitening: A Cross-Sectional Content Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
- The Quality of Evidence of and Engagement With Video Medical Claims.JAMA network open · 2026Article
- Vaccine literacy and attitudes toward ımmunization among adults in primary care.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Article
- Cognitive load and individual differences as drivers of health-related misinformation: A signal detection approach.PloS one · 2026Article
- The influence of national origin cues in HPV vaccination advertising: An eye-tracking study of visual attention and vaccine perception using quantitative and qualitative analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Poison, lies, war: A mixed methods content analysis of posts about COVID-19 vaccination on Gab Social.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2025Article
- Characterizing the landscape of pediatric immunization schedules in the US and Europe.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Underreporting of Adverse Events Following COVID-19 Vaccination Among Healthcare Professionals in Poland: Potential Implications for Vaccine Hesitancy.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2025Article
- Vaccination Conversations on X in Spanish and Catalan: Qualitative Content Analysis.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
- Viewpoint on the Intersection Among Health Information, Misinformation, and Generative AI Technologies.JMIR infodemiology · 2025Article
182 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Distrust in scientific expertise
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.