Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499491›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2020

Sagittal en bloc resection of primary tumors in the thoracic and lumbar spine: feasibility, safety and outcome.

Lei Dang, Zhongjun Liu, Xiaoguang Liu, Liang Jiang, Miao Yu, Fengliang Wu, Feng Wei

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Treatment of spinal deformity with diastematomyelia type I: one-stage, two-stage surgery and new technique (vertebral column resection through wide bony septum).Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lei DangOrthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, No 49. North Garden Road, HaiDian District, 100191, Beijing, China.
Zhongjun LiuOrthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, No 49. North Garden Road, HaiDian District, 100191, Beijing, China.
Xiaoguang LiuOrthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, No 49. North Garden Road, HaiDian District, 100191, Beijing, China.
Liang JiangOrthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, No 49. North Garden Road, HaiDian District, 100191, Beijing, China.
Miao YuOrthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, No 49. North Garden Road, HaiDian District, 100191, Beijing, China.
Fengliang WuOrthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, No 49. North Garden Road, HaiDian District, 100191, Beijing, China.
Feng WeiOrthopaedic Department of Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing Key Laboratory of Spinal Disease Research, No 49. North Garden Road, HaiDian District, 100191, Beijing, China. weifeng@bjmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study is to test feasibility, safety and the outcome of sagittal en bloc resection of paravertebral primary tumors in the thoracic and the lumbar spine. Sagittal en bloc resection was planned based on WBB classification and performed via combined anterior-posterior or anterior-posterior-lateral approach in 9 consecutive patients with aggressive benign or malignant paravertebral primary tumors in the thoracic and lumbar spine. Surgical margins were evaluated both radiologically and histopathologically. Follow-up data regarding survival rate, local control, morbidity, hardware failure and postoperative function were collected at around 2 years after surgery. En bloc resection was achieved in all patient with wide margin in 7/9 patients, marginal and intralesional margin in 2/9 patients. Survival rate and local control rate were 100%. There were 4/9 cases of major complications and 2/9 cases of minor complications with an overall morbidity rate of 67% (6/9). All but one patient with intraoperative spinal cord injury were free of neurological deficits and fully mobile in absence of any indication of hardware failure. With a careful choice of surgical procedure, sagittal en bloc resection of paravertebral primary tumor in the thoracic and lumbar spine is feasible, safe and effective.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLumbar VertebraeMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedOrthopedic ProceduresSafetySpinal NeoplasmsThoracic VertebraeTreatment OutcomeYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32499491
PMCPMC7272461

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.