Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499273›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

Identifying and de-implementing low-value care in primary care: the GP's perspective-a cross-sectional survey.

Rudolf Bertijn Kool, Eva W Verkerk, Lieke Ja Winnemuller, Tjerk Wiersma, Gert P Westert, Jaco S Burgers, Simone A van Dulmen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. The impact of Choosing WiselyBMC health services research · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  12. Reducing the environmental burden of unnecessary investigations.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rudolf Bertijn KoolRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands tijn.kool@radboudumc.nl.ORCID 0000-0003-3134-487X
Eva W VerkerkRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Lieke Ja WinnemullerRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Tjerk WiersmaDutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Gert P WestertRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jaco S BurgersDutch College of General Practitioners, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Simone A van DulmenRadboud Institute for Health Sciences, IQ healthcare, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4003-8540
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLDutch College of General Practitioners · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveGeneral practitioners have an important role in reducing low-value care as gatekeepers of the health system. The aim of this study was to assess the experiences of Dutch general practitioners regarding low-value care and to identify their needs to decrease low-value primary care.

designWe performed a cross-sectional study.

participantsWe sent a survey to 500 general practitioners.

settingPrimary care in the Netherlands. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOMES: The survey contained questions about the provision of low-value care and on clinical cases about lumbosacral spine X-rays in patients with low back pain and vitamin B

resultsA total of 182 general practitioners (37%) responded. 67% indicated that low-value care practices are regularly provided in general practice. 57% of the general practitioners have seen negative consequences of low-value care, in particular side effects of medication. The most provided low-value care practices are medication prescriptions such as antibiotics and laboratory tests such as vitamin B

conclusionGeneral practitioners are aware of providing unnecessary care despite their role as gatekeepers and have reasons for this. They need support in order to change their practice. This support might consist of better education of healthcare professionals and providing more time for consultation. Local and national media, such as websites and television, could be used to educate patients while guidelines could support professionals in reducing low-value care.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelGeneral PracticeHealth Plan ImplementationPrimary Health CareQuality of Health CareCross-Sectional StudiesHealth SurveysHumansNetherlandsPhysician's RoleReferral and Consultationhealth policyorganisation of health servicesprimary careprotocols & guidelinesquality in health care

Identifiers

PMID32499273
PMCPMC7279641
OpenAlexW3033858483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.