Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499269›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2020

EUPRON: nurses' practice in interprofessional pharmaceutical care in Europe. A cross-sectional survey in 17 countries.

Elyne De Baetselier, Bart Van Rompaey, Luis M Batalha, Monica Bergqvist, Bozena Czarkowska-Paczek, Alberto De Santis, Nienke E Dijkstra, Maria I Fernandes, Izabela Filov, Vigdis Abrahamsen Grøndahl and 20 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. [Drug Therapy Safety in Outpatient Care Services].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Home care nurses' management of high-risk medications: a cross-sectional study.Journal of pharmaceutical policy and practice · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors.

Elyne De BaetselierNursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium elyne.debaetselier@uantwerpen.be.ORCID 0000-0002-1586-7825
Bart Van RompaeyNursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.
Luis M BatalhaHigher School of Nursing of Coimbra Health Sciences Research Unit Nursing, Coimbra, Portugal.
Monica BergqvistDepartment of Neurobiology Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Huddinge, Sweden.
Bozena Czarkowska-PaczekDepartment of Clinical Nursing, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland.
Alberto De SantisANASTE-Humanitas Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Nienke E DijkstraResearch Group Care for the Chronically Ill, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Maria I FernandesHigher School of Nursing of Coimbra Health Sciences Research Unit Nursing, Coimbra, Portugal.
Izabela FilovSaint Kliment Ohridski University Bitola, Bitola, Bitola, The former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia.
Vigdis Abrahamsen GrøndahlFaculty of Health and Welfare, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway.
Jana HeczkovaInstitute of Nursing Theory and Practice, Charles University First Faculty of Medicine, Praha, Czech Republic.
Ann Karin HelgesenFaculty of Health and Welfare, Østfold University College, Halden, Norway.
Michael IsfortDeutsches Institut für angewandte Pflegeforschung e V, Köln, Germany.
Susan JordanNursing, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Igor KarnjusDepartment of Nursing, University of Primorska College of Health Care, Izola, Slovenia.
Sarah KeeleyDepartment of Nursing and Clinical Science, Bournemouth University, Dorset, UK.
Petros KolovosDepartment of Nursing, Laboratory of Integrated Health Care, University of Peloponesse, Sparti, Greece.
Gero LangerMedical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Manuel Lillo-CrespoDepartment of Nursing, Universitat d'Alacant, Alacant, Spain.
Vera LoganNursing, Swansea University, Swansea, UK.
Alba MalaraANASTE-Humanitas Foundation, Rome, Italy.
Gabriele MeyerMedical Faculty, Institute of Health and Nursing Sciences, Martin-Luther-Universitat Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany.
Andras OlahInstitute of Nursing Sciences, Basic Health Sciences and Health Visiting, University of Pecs Faculty of Health Sciences, Pecs, Hungary.
Hana PadysakovaFaculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Mirko ProsenFaculty of Health Sciences, Department of Nursing, University of Primorska College of Health Care, Izola, Slovenia.
Dorina PusztaiInstitute of Nursing Sciences, Basic Health Sciences and Health Visiting, University of Pecs Faculty of Health Sciences, Pecs, Hungary.
Carolien G SinoResearch Group Care for the Chronically Ill, HU University of Applied Sciences Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Styliani TziaferiDepartment of Nursing, Laboratory of Integrated Health Care, University of Peloponesse, Sparti, Greece.
Elena ZiakovaFaculty of Nursing and Professional Health Studies, Slovak Medical University in Bratislava, Bratislava, Slovakia.
Tinne DillesNursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Antwerp, Wilrijk, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSafe pharmaceutical care (PC) requires an interprofessional team approach, involving physicians, nurses and pharmacists. Nurses' roles however, are not always explicit and clear, complicating interprofessional collaboration. The aim of this study is to describe nurses' practice and interprofessional collaboration in PC, from the viewpoint of nurses, physicians and pharmacists.

designA cross-sectional survey.

settingThe study was conducted in 17 European countries, each with their own health systems.

participantsPharmacists, physicians and nurses with an active role in PC were surveyed.

main outcome measuresNurses' involvement in PC, experiences of interprofessional collaboration and communication and views on nurses' competences.

resultsA total of 4888 nurses, 974 physicians and 857 pharmacists from 17 European countries responded. Providing patient education and information (PEI), monitoring medicines adherence (MMA), monitoring adverse/therapeutic effects (ME) and prescribing medicines were considered integral to nursing practice by 78%, 73%, 69% and 15% of nurses, respectively. Most respondents were convinced that quality of PC would be improved by increasing nurses' involvement in ME (95%), MMA (95%), PEI (91%) and prescribing (53%). Mean scores for the reported quality of collaboration between nurses and physicians, collaboration between nurses and pharmacists and interprofessional communication were respectively <7/10, ≤4/10, <6/10 for all four aspects of PC.

conclusionsME, MMA, PEI and prescribing are part of nurses' activities, and most healthcare professionals felt their involvement should be extended. Collaboration between nurses and physicians on PC is limited and between nurses and pharmacists even more.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesInterprofessional RelationsNurse's RoleCross-Cultural ComparisonEuropeHumansInterdisciplinary CommunicationPatient Care TeamPharmaceutical ServicesSurveys and Questionnaireshealth services administration & managementinternational health servicesquality in healthcare

Identifiers

PMID32499269
PMCPMC7282395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.