Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499244›Full record

Trial reportHaematologica2021

Lenalidomide before and after autologous stem cell transplantation for transplant-eligible patients of all ages in the randomized, phase III, Myeloma XI trial.

Graham H Jackson, Faith E Davies, Charlotte Pawlyn, David A Cairns, Alina Striha, Corinne Collett, Anna Waterhouse, John R Jones, Bhuvan Kishore, Mamta Garg and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Haematologica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Co-Occurrence of Cytogenetic Abnormalities and High-Risk Disease in Newly Diagnosed and Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 14 institutions in 2 countries.

Graham H JacksonNorthern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Faith E DaviesPerlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Charlotte PawlynThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David A CairnsClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK.
Alina StrihaClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK.
Corinne CollettClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK.
Anna WaterhouseClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK.
John R JonesKings College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Bhuvan KishoreHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
Mamta GargLeicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK.
Cathy D WilliamsCentre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
Kamaraj KarunanithiUniversity Hospital of North Midlands, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Jindriska LindsayEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust, Canterbury, UK.
David AlloteyDerby Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK.
Salim ShafeekWorcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust, Worcester, UK.
Matthew W JennerUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.
Gordon CookSection of Experimental Haematology, Leeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, University of Leeds, UK.
Nigel H RussellCentre for Clinical Haematology, Nottingham University Hospital, Nottingham, UK.
Martin F KaiserThe Institute of Cancer Research and The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark T DraysonClinical Immunology, School of Immunity and Infection, University of Birmingham, UK.
Roger G OwenSt James's University Hospital, Haematological Malignancy Diagnostic Service (HMDS), Leeds, UK.
Walter M GregoryClinical Trials Research Unit, Leeds Institute of Clinical Trials Research, University of Leeds, UK.
Gareth J MorganPerlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York, USA.
Uk Ncri Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group
University of Leeds · GBInstitute of Cancer Research · GBNYU Langone Health · USUniversity of Nottingham · GBEast Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust · GBHeart of England NHS Foundation Trust · GBKing's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust · GBLeicester Royal Infirmary · GBNewcastle University · GBSt James's University Hospital · GBUniversity Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust · GBUniversity Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBWorcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust · GB

Funding

Cancer Research UK 25447Cancer Research UK 29957Cancer Research UK C1298/A10410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The optimal way to use immunomodulatory drugs as components of induction and maintenance therapy for multiple myeloma is unresolved. We addressed this question in a large phase III randomized trial, Myeloma XI. Patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (n = 2042) were randomized to induction therapy with cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone (CTD) or cyclophosphamide, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (CRD). Additional intensification therapy with cyclophosphamide, bortezomib and dexamethasone (CVD) was administered before ASCT to patients with a suboptimal response to induction therapy using a response-adapted approach. After receiving high-dose melphalan with autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), eligible patients were further randomized to receive either lenalidomide alone or observation alone. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The CRD regimen was associated with significantly longer PFS (median: 36 vs. 33 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-0.96; P = 0.0116) and OS (3-year OS: 82.9% vs. 77.0%; HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.63-0.93; P = 0.0072) compared with CTD. The PFS and OS results favored CRD over CTD across all subgroups, including patients with International Staging System stage III disease (HR for PFS, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93; HR for OS, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56-1.09), high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43-0.84; HR for OS, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.42-1.15) and ultra high-risk cytogenetics (HR for PFS, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.41-1.11; HR for OS, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.34-1.25). Among patients randomized to lenalidomide maintenance (n = 451) or observation (n = 377), maintenance therapy improved PFS (median: 50 vs. 28 months; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.37-0.60; P < 0.0001). Optimal results for PFS and OS were achieved in the patients who received CRD induction and lenalidomide maintenance. The trial was registered with the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT 2009-010956-93) and ISRCTN49407852.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMultiple MyelomaAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBortezomibDexamethasoneHumansLenalidomideStem Cell TransplantationTransplantation, AutologousBortezomibDexamethasoneLenalidomide

Identifiers

PMID32499244
PMCPMC8252959
OpenAlexW3033413047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.