Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32499169›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery2020

Is it Possible to Safely Maintain a Regular Vascular Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic?

Rodolfo Pini, Gianluca Faggioli, Andrea Vacirca, Enrico Gallitto, Chiara Mascoli, Luciano Attard, Pierluigi Viale, Mauro Gargiulo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Setting-specific Transmission Rates: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Maintaining Safe Elective Aneurysm Surgery in the COVID-19 Era.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2021
    Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Regional Survey in Lombardy, Northern Italy, on Vascular Surgery Intervention Outcomes During The COVID-19 Pandemic.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2021
    Observational
  10. Vascular Surgery During COVID-19 Emergency in Hub Hospitals of Lombardy: Experience on 305 Patients.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2021
    Article
  11. Learn from the First Wave to Surf the Next One Optimally.European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2021
    Article
  12. Article
  13. The "Vascular Surgery COVID-19 Collaborative" (VASCC).European journal of vascular and endovascular surgery : the official journal of the European Society for Vascular Surgery · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Rodolfo PiniVascular Surgery Metropolitan Unit, University of Bologna, DIMES, Policlinico S. Orsola and Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.
Gianluca FaggioliVascular Surgery Metropolitan Unit, University of Bologna, DIMES, Policlinico S. Orsola and Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy. Electronic address: gianluca.faggioli@unibo.it.
Andrea VacircaVascular Surgery Metropolitan Unit, University of Bologna, DIMES, Policlinico S. Orsola and Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.
Enrico GallittoVascular Surgery Metropolitan Unit, University of Bologna, DIMES, Policlinico S. Orsola and Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.
Chiara MascoliVascular Surgery Metropolitan Unit, University of Bologna, DIMES, Policlinico S. Orsola and Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.
Luciano AttardInfective Disease Unit, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy.
Pierluigi VialeInfective Disease Unit, University of Bologna, DIMEC, Policlinico S.Orsola, Bologna, Italy.
Mauro GargiuloVascular Surgery Metropolitan Unit, University of Bologna, DIMES, Policlinico S. Orsola and Ospedale Maggiore, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the protocol adopted during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic to maintain elective activity in a vascular surgery unit while minimising the risk of contamination to both patients and physicians, and the impact of this activity on the intensive care (IC) resources.

methodsThe activity of a vascular surgery unit was analysed from 8 March to 8 April 2020. Surgical activity was maintained only for acute or elective procedures obeying priority criteria. The preventive screening protocol consisted of nasopharyngeal swabs (NPS) for all patients and physicians with symptoms and for unprotected contact infected cases, and serological physician evaluations every 15 days. Patients treated in the acute setting were considered theoretically infected and the necessary protective devices were used. The number of patients and the possible infection of physicians were evaluated. The number and type of interventions and the need for post-operative IC during this period were compared with those in the same periods in 2018 and 2019.

resultsOne hundred and fifty-one interventions were performed, of which 34 (23%) were acute/emergency. The total number of interventions was similar to those performed in the same periods in 2019 and 2018: 150 (33, of which 22% acute/emergency) and 117 (29, 25% acute/emergency), respectively. IC was necessary after 6% (17% in 2019 and 20% in 2018) of elective operations and 33% (11) of acute/emergency interventions. None of the patients treated electively were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection during hospitalisation. Of the 34 patients treated in acute/emergency interventions, five (15%) were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection. It was necessary to screen 14 (47%) vascular surgeons with NPS after contact with infected colleagues, but none for unprotected contact with patients; all were found to be negative on NPS and serological evaluation.

conclusionA dedicated protocol allowed maintenance of regular elective vascular surgery activity during the emergency phase of the COVID-19 pandemic, with no contamination of patients or physicians and minimal need for IC resources.

Indexed as

Coronavirus InfectionsElective Surgical ProceduresEmergency Service, HospitalInfection ControlPandemicsPneumonia, ViralVascular DiseasesVascular Surgical ProceduresAdultBetacoronavirusClinical ProtocolsComorbidityCOVID-19Critical PathwaysFemaleHumansCOVID-19Regular practiceSurgeryVascular surgery

Identifiers

PMID32499169
PMCPMC7236703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.