Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32498708›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Technologically-enhanced psychological interventions for older adults: a scoping review.

F Vailati Riboni, B Comazzi, K Bercovitz, G Castelnuovo, E Molinari, F Pagnini

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Multidimensional determinants of active and healthy aging trajectories: a position paper from the Age-It Research Program.The journals of gerontology. Series B, Psychological sciences and social sciences · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Social Frailty and Health-Related Quality of Life in Community-Dwelling Older Adults.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

F Vailati RiboniDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy. f.vailatiriboni@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-3297-120X
B ComazziDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
K BercovitzDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA.
G CastelnuovoDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
E MolinariDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.
F PagniniDepartment of Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe world population is getting older. As life expectancy increases, traditional health care systems are facing different challenges in terms of cost reduction and high-quality service delivery capability. New ways to improve older adults' quality of life have been explored, taking advantage of new technological solutions. Our focus is on the integration of technology in clinical treatments to facilitate or deliver psychological interventions meant to improve well-being in older adults. Our aims were to describe the main technology-based interventions supporting seniors' quality of life or psychological well-being and to provide greater clarity to what is described in the current literature as their effects on seniors' cognitive and psychological outcomes and healthcare policies.

methodsWe reviewed the scientific literature looking for studies that investigated how technology can be implemented into clinical psychology treatments for older adults. Our search was conducted using the following databases: PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, ISI Web of Science, and CINAHL. The search provided 350 articles, mostly (≈90%) dated after 2002. Abstract analysis narrowed the selection to 150 papers, according to their relevance and actuality as judged by a restricted group of independent researchers.

resultsThrough a thematic analysis, we found that virtual reality (VR), robots, telemedicine, software, video games, and smartphone applications could potentially support older adults' psychological treatment with a positive impact on healthcare systems.

conclusionFindings from the literature are encouraging, although most of these results are only preliminary.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeTelemedicineAgedHumansPsychosocial InterventionAgingClinical psychologyHealthcareOlder adultsPsychological interventionsTechnology

Identifiers

PMID32498708
PMCPMC7271488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.