Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32498694›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2020

Outcomes and potential mechanism of a protocol to optimize foot orthoses in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Marloes Tenten-Diepenmaat, Joost Dekker, Jos W R Twisk, Elleke Huijbrechts, Leo D Roorda, Marike van der Leeden

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Pedobarographic evaluations in physical medicine and rehabilitation practice.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marloes Tenten-DiepenmaatAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. m.tenten@reade.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0432-0955
Joost DekkerDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Jos W R TwiskDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam Public Health research institute, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Elleke HuijbrechtsAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Leo D RoordaAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marike van der LeedenAmsterdam Rehabilitation Research Center | Reade, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Reade · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLFontys University of Applied Sciences · NL

Funding

Dutch Arthritis Association BP11-1-260
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFoot problems are highly prevalent in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Treatment of foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis often consists of custom made foot orthoses. One of the assumed working mechanisms of foot orthoses is redistribution of plantar pressure by creating a larger weight bearing area. Overall, the reported treatment effect of foot orthoses on foot pain in rheumatoid arthritis is small to medium. Therefore, we developed a foot orthoses optimization protocol for evaluation and adaptation of foot orthoses by using the feedback of in-shoe plantar pressure measurements. The objectives of the present study were: 1) to evaluate the 3-months outcomes of foot orthoses developed according to the protocol on pain, physical functioning and forefoot plantar pressure in patients with foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis, and 2) to determine the relationship between change in forefoot plantar pressure and change in pain and physical functioning.

methodsForty-five patients with foot problems related to rheumatoid arthritis were included and received foot orthoses developed according to the protocol. Outcome measures were assessed at baseline and after three months of wearing foot orthoses in 38 patients. Change scores and effect sizes (ES) were calculated for pain, physical functioning and plantar pressure. In a subgroup of patients with combined forefoot pain and high plantar pressure, the relationship between change in plantar pressure and change in pain and physical functioning was analyzed.

resultsIn the total group of 38 patients, statistically significant changes in pain (ES 0.69), physical functioning (ES 0.82) and forefoot plantar pressure (ES 0.35) were found. In the subgroup (n = 23) no statistically significant relationships were found between change in plantar pressure and change in pain or physical functioning.

conclusionFoot orthoses developed according to a protocol for improving the plantar pressure redistribution properties lead to medium to large improvements in pain and physical functioning. The hypothesis that more pressure reduction would lead to better clinical outcomes could not be proven.

Indexed as

Foot OrthosesShoesAdaptation, PhysiologicalAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidEquipment DesignFemaleFootFoot DiseasesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPainPain MeasurementFootIn-shoe plantar pressure measurementsOrthosesOrthotic deviceOutcome assessment (health care)Rheumatoid arthritis

Identifiers

PMID32498694
PMCPMC7273675
OpenAlexW3033893680

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.