Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32498672›Full record

ArticleBMC geriatrics2020

Towards an understanding of the burdens of medication management affecting older people: the MEMORABLE realist synthesis.

Ian Maidment, Sally Lawson, Geoff Wong, Andrew Booth, Anne Watson, Hadar Zaman, Judy Mullan, Jane McKeown, Sylvia Bailey

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC geriatrics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Tools to evaluate medication management for caregivers of people living with dementia: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2021
    Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Supporting Older People Living With Frailty to Self-Manage Multiple Medicines: An Experience-Based Co-Design of a Complex Intervention Developed in UK Primary Care.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. 'It's a job to be done'. Managing polypharmacy at home: A qualitative interview study exploring the experiences of older people living with frailty.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A rapid review of interventions to improve medicine self-management for older people living at home.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Ian MaidmentSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK. i.maidment@aston.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-4152-9704
Sally LawsonSchool of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX2 6GG, UK.
Andrew BoothSchool of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK.
Anne WatsonMedicines Management Department, West Heath Hospital, Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust, Rednal Road, Birmingham, B38 8HR, UK.
Hadar ZamanBradford School of Pharmacy, School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, N8 Richmond Building, Richmond Road, Bradford, BD7 1DP, UK.
Judy MullanAustralian Health Services Research Institute (AHSRI), iC Enterprise 1, Innovation Campus, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, 2522, Australia.
Jane McKeownSheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust, Fulwood House, Old Fulwood Road, Sheffield, S10 3TH, UK.
Sylvia BaileyPPI representative, School of Life and Health Sciences, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
Aston University · GBBirmingham Community Healthcare NHS Trust · GBSheffield Health and Social Care NHS Foundation Trust · GBUniversity of Bradford · GBUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Sheffield · GBUniversity of Wollongong · AU

Funding

Department of Health 15/137/01Health Services and Delivery Research Programme 15/137/01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMore older people are living in the community with multiple diagnoses and medications. Managing multiple medications produces issues of unrivalled complexity for those involved. Despite increasing literature on the subject, gaps remain in understanding how, why and for whom complex medication management works, and therefore how best to improve practice and outcomes. MEMORABLE, MEdication Management in Older people: Realist Approaches Based on Literature and Evaluation, aimed to address these gaps.

methodsMEMORABLE used realism to understand causal paths within medication management. Informed by RAMESES (Realist And Meta-narrative Evidence Synthesis: and Evolving Standards) guidelines, MEMORABLE involved three overlapping work packages: 1) Realist Review of the literature (24 articles on medication management exploring causality); 2) Realist Evaluation (50 realist-informed interviews with older people, family carers and health and care practitioners, explaining their experiences); and 3) data synthesis and theorising from 1) and 2).

resultsMedication management was viewed from the perspective of 'implementation' and structured into five stages: identifying a problem (Stage 1), getting a diagnosis and/or medications (Stage 2), starting, changing or stopping medications (Stage 3), continuing to take medications (Stage 4), and reviewing/reconciling medications (Stage 5). Three individual stages (1, 3 and 4) are conducted by the older person sometimes with family carer support when they balance routines, coping and risk. Stages 2 and 5 are interpersonal where the older person works with a practitioner-prescriber-reviewer, perhaps with carer involvement. Applying Normalisation Process Theory, four steps were identified within each stage: 1) sense making: information, clarification; 2) action: shared-decision-making; 3) reflection/monitoring; and 4) enduring relationships, based on collaboration and mutual trust. In a detailed analysis of Stage 5: Reviewing/reconciling medications, adopting the lens of 'burden', MEMORABLE identified five burdens amenable to mitigation: ambiguity, concealment, unfamiliarity, fragmentation and exclusion. Two initial improvement propositions were identified for further research: a risk screening tool and individualised information.

conclusionsOlder people and family carers often find medication management challenging and burdensome particularly for complex regimens. Practitioners need to be aware of this potential challenge, and work with older people and their carers to minimise the burden associated with medication management.

trial registrationPROSPERO 2016:CRD42016043506.

Indexed as

CaregiversMedication Therapy ManagementAgedAged, 80 and overHumansBurdenComplexityInformal carersMedication managementMedication optimisationMulti-morbidityNormalisation process theoryOlder peoplePolypharmacy

Identifiers

PMID32498672
PMCPMC7272211
OpenAlexW3022507353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.