Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32498516›Full record

ArticleLangmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids2020

Understanding Mono- and Bivalent Ion Selectivities of Nanoporous Graphene Using Ionic and Bi-ionic Potentials.

Mandakranta Ghosh, Lukas Madauß, Marika Schleberger, Henning Lebius, Abdenacer Benyagoub, Jeffery A Wood, Rob G H Lammertink

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Mandakranta GhoshSoft Matter, Fluidics and Interfaces, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands.
Lukas MadaußFakultät für Physik und CENIDE, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 47048 Duisburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2556-5967
Marika SchlebergerFakultät für Physik und CENIDE, Universität Duisburg-Essen, 47048 Duisburg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5785-1186
Henning LebiusNormandie University, ENSICAEN, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, CIMAP, 14050 Caen, France.
Abdenacer BenyagoubNormandie University, ENSICAEN, UNICAEN, CEA, CNRS, CIMAP, 14050 Caen, France.
Jeffery A WoodSoft Matter, Fluidics and Interfaces, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9438-1048
Rob G H LammertinkSoft Matter, Fluidics and Interfaces, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of Twente, 7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0827-2946
University of Twente · NLCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRUniversity of Duisburg-Essen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nanoporous graphene displays salt-dependent ion permeation. In this work, we investigate the differences in Donnan potentials arising between reservoirs, separated by a perforated graphene membrane, containing different cations. We compare the case of monovalent cations interacting with nanoporous graphene with the case of bivalent cations. This is accomplished through both measurements of membrane potential arising between two salt reservoirs at different concentrations involving a single cation (ionic potential) and between two reservoirs containing different cations at the same concentration (bi-ionic potential). In our present study, Donnan dialysis experiments involve bivalent MgCl

Identifiers

PMID32498516
PMCPMC7346097
OpenAlexW3033652176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.