Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32498423›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2020

Clinical Trials of Stem Cell Treatment for Spinal Cord Injury.

Kazuyoshi Yamazaki, Masahito Kawabori, Toshitaka Seki, Kiyohiro Houkin

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05831163 (A Review of Clinical Trial Experiences and Trends From Spinal Cord Injury Patients), which is not on this map. Cited by 69 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
69citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05831163 unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

A Review of Clinical Trial Experiences and Trends From Spinal Cord Injury Patients

TypeobservationalSponsorPower Life Sciences Inc.Ran2024 to 2026Enrolled500ConditionsSpinal Cord Injuries
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

69 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Personalized Stem Cell-Based Regeneration in Spinal Cord Injury Care.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

9 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kazuyoshi YamazakiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan.
Masahito KawaboriDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-3574-8380
Toshitaka SekiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan.
Kiyohiro HoukinDepartment of Neurosurgery, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine, Sapporo 060-8638, Hokkaido, Japan.

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP17bk0104045Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Fujita Memorial Fund for Medical Research
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are more than one million patients worldwide suffering paralysis caused by spinal cord injury (SCI). SCI causes severe socioeconomic problems not only to the patients and their caregivers but also to society; therefore, the development of innovative treatments is crucial. Many pharmacological therapies have been attempted in an effort to reduce SCI-related damage; however, no single therapy that could dramatically improve the serious long-term sequelae of SCI has emerged. Stem cell transplantation therapy, which can ameliorate damage or regenerate neurological networks, has been proposed as a promising candidate for SCI treatment, and many basic and clinical experiments using stem cells for SCI treatment have been launched, with promising results. However, the cell transplantation methods, including cell type, dose, transplantation route, and transplantation timing, vary widely between trials, and there is no consensus regarding the most effective treatment strategy. This study reviews the current knowledge on this issue, with a special focus on the clinical trials that have used stem cells for treating SCI, and highlights the problems that remain to be solved before the widespread clinical use of stem cells can be adopted.

Indexed as

Mesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicHematopoietic Stem CellsHumansInduced Pluripotent Stem CellsInflammationMesenchymal Stem CellsNeural Stem CellsNeurogenesisRecovery of FunctionRegenerative MedicineSpinal CordSpinal Cord Injuriesinflammationneurogenesisregenerative medicinespinal cord injurystem celltransplantation

Identifiers

PMID32498423
PMCPMC7313002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.