Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32498296›Full record

ArticleNutrients2020

Improving the Reporting of Young Children's Food Intake: Insights from a Cognitive Interviewing Study with Mothers of 3-7-Year Old Children.

Dorota Zarnowiecki, Rebecca A Byrne, Glen E Bodner, Lucinda K Bell, Rebecca K Golley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nutrients, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Dorota ZarnowieckiSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Rebecca A ByrneNHMRC Centre of Research Excellence in the Early Prevention of Obesity in Childhood, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Glen E BodnerCollege of Education, Psychology and Social Work, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, Australia.
Lucinda K BellSchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.
Rebecca K GolleySchool of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research Council APP1101675
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Short food questions (SFQ) allow for rapid reporting of food intake across a variety of settings but are limited by poor validity and reliability. Understanding the recall process used by parents to report children's food intake can improve question design and psychometric performance. This study aimed to improve understanding of how parents report children's dietary intake using SFQ. Semi-structured, cognitive interviews were conducted with 21 mothers of 3-7-year-old children. Mothers were asked to 'think-aloud' while answering SFQ about their child's food intake. Thematic analysis identified themes relating to parent's question and answer process and barriers to recall. Information retrieval strategies focused on 'use-of-time' and 'sphere of food provision' and differed for core versus unhealthy foods. Recall of routine and home food provision were used to report core food intake, whereas recall of special occasions and food provision outside the home guided recall of discretionary foods. Mothers utilize different recall strategies for core and discretionary foods based on use of time and the sphere of food provision. The ease of reporting children's dietary intake may be improved by utilizing a shorter recall time frame, clear and direct question wording, and use of food examples and recall prompts.

Indexed as

Mental RecallAdultChildChild, PreschoolEatingFeeding BehaviorFemaleHumansInterview, PsychologicalMaleMother-Child RelationsMothersSurveys and Questionnaireschild food intakecognitive interviewdietary intake assessmentparentqualitative researchshort food questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID32498296
PMCPMC7352554

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.