ReviewJournal of clinical medicine2020
Acute Coronary Syndromes and Covid-19: Exploring the Uncertainties.
Review in Journal of clinical medicine, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 123 citations in OpenAlex.
- Impact of prior statin use on clinical outcomes in COVID-19 patients: data from tertiary referral hospitals during COVID-19 pandemic in Italy.Journal of clinical lipidologyTrial
- Pathogenesis of Acute Coronary Syndromes in Patients After COVID-19: An Optical Coherence Tomography Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Phenotypic switch of vascular smooth muscle cells in COVID-19: Role of cholesterol, calcium, and phosphate.Journal of cellular physiology · 2024Review
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on the accuracy of telephone triage of callers with shortness of breath and/or chest discomfort in Dutch out-of-hours primary care: A retrospective observational study.The European journal of general practice · 2024Observational
- Evaluation of cardiac biomarkers among dead and alive COVID-19 patients in Southwest Iran.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2024Article
- Comparison of the Effects of Recent Coronavirus 2019 Infection and Vaccination on the Prognosis of Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Retrospective Study Conducted in a Single Center in Türkiye.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2024Article
- Accuracy of urgency allocation in patients with shortness of breath calling out-of-hours primary care: a cross-sectional study.BMC primary care · 2024Article
- Acute Myocardial Infarction during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Long-Term Outcomes and Prognosis-A Systematic Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells in the Treatment of COVID-19.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Statistical findings and outcomes of acute coronary syndrome patients during COVID-19 pandemic: A cross sectional study.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2023Article
- A Review of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19.Heart failure clinics · 2023Review
- Myocardial infarction and viral triggers: what do we know by now?European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023Article
- Statins Use in Patients with Cardiovascular Diseases and COVID-19 Outcomes: An Italian Population-Based Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Pathomechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 infection and development of atherosclerosis in patients with COVID-19: A review.Medicine · 2022Review
- Long-term effect of SARS-CoV-2 infection on cardiovascular outcomes and all-cause mortality.Life sciences · 2022Review
- The Challenge of High Coronary Thrombotic Events in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and COVID-19.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- Effect of COVID-19 Pandemic on Acute Coronary Syndrome Clinical Practice Patterns: Findings from a Multicenter Clinician Survey in China.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Clinical Management of New-Onset Atrial Fibrillation in COVID-19 Patients Referred to a Tertiary Cardiac Arrhythmia Center after Hospital Discharge.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022Article
- A Review of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction in Patients with COVID-19.Cardiology clinics · 2022Review
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Since an association between myocardial infarction (MI) and respiratory infections has been described for influenza viruses and other respiratory viral agents, understanding possible physiopathological links between severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is of the greatest importance. The initial data suggest an underestimation of ACS cases all over the world, but acute MI still represents a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide and should not be overshadowed during the coronavirus disease (Covid-19) pandemic. No common consensus regarding the most adequate healthcare management policy for ACS is currently available. Indeed, important differences have been reported between the measures employed to treat ACS in China during the first disease outbreak and what currently represents clinical practice across Europe and the USA. This review aims to discuss the pathophysiological links between MI, respiratory infections, and Covid-19; epidemiological data related to ACS at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic; and learnings that have emerged so far from several catheterization labs and coronary care units all over the world, in order to shed some light on the current strategies for optimal management of ACS patients with confirmed or suspected SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.