Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32498128›Full record

GuidelineJournal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV2020

Position statement of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Task Force on Quality of Life and Patient Oriented Outcomes on quality of life issues in dermatologic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic.

P V Chernyshov, L Tomas-Aragones, M Augustin, A Svensson, A Bewley, F Poot, J C Szepietowski, S E Marron, L Manolache, N Pustisek and 10 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readPractice Guideline
In one paragraph

Guideline in Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Quality of Life in Hidradenitis Suppurativa: An Update.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 12 countries.

P V ChernyshovDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, National Medical University, Kiev, Ukraine.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7275-4651
L Tomas-AragonesDepartment of Psychology, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5891-628X
M AugustinInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4026-8728
A SvenssonDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2821-7418
A BewleyWhipps Cross University Hospital, London, UK.
F PootDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Erasme, Brussels, Belgium.
J C SzepietowskiDepartment of Dermatology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0766-6342
S E MarronDepartment of Dermatology, University, Hospital Miguel Servet, Aragon Psychodermatology Research Group (GAI+PD), Zaragoza, Spain.
L ManolacheDermatology, Dali Medical, Bucharest, Romania.
N PustisekChildren's Hospital Zagreb, Medical School, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
A SuruPaediatric Dermatology Discipline, Dermatology Research Unit, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Colentina Clinical Hospital, Bucharest, Romania.
C M SalavastruDepartment of Paediatric Dermatology, Colentina Clinical Hospital, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
C BlomeInstitute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, German Center for Health Services Research in Dermatology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
M S SalekSchool of Life & Medical Sciences, University of Hertfordshire, Hatfield, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4612-5699
D AbeniClinical Epidemiology Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
F SampognaClinical Epidemiology Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7624-3290
F DalgardDepartment of Dermatology and Venereology, Skane University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
D LinderDepartment of Dermatology, Ben Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0305-3146
A W M EversHealth, Medical, and Neuropsychology unit, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands.
A Y FinlayDivision of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2143-1646
Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy · ROIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITSkåne University Hospital · SEUniversität Hamburg · DEBen-Gurion University of the Negev · ILCardiff University · GBErasmus Hospital · BELeiden University · NLOdessa National Medical University · UAQueen Mary University of London · GBUniversidad de Zaragoza · ESUniversity of Hertfordshire · GBUniversity of Zagreb · HRWroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The pandemic of COVID-19 is a global challenge for health care, and dermatologists are not standing apart from trying to meet this challenge. The European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) has collected recommendations from its Task Forces (TFs) related to COVID-19. The Journal of the EADV has established a COVID-19 Special Forum giving free access to related articles. The psychosocial effects of the pandemic, an increase in contact dermatitis and several other skin diseases because of stress, disinfectants and protective equipment use, especially in healthcare workers, the temporary limited access to dermatologic care, the dilemma whether or not to pause immunosuppressive therapy, and, finally, the occurrence of skin lesions in patients infected by COVID-19 all contribute to significant quality of life (QoL) impairment. Here, we present detailed recommendations of the EADV TF on QoL and patient-oriented outcomes on how to improve QoL in dermatologic patients during the COVID-19 pandemic for several different groups of patients and for the general population.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAdvisory CommitteesBetacoronavirusCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19DermatologyEuropeHumansInfection ControlInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalPandemicsPeriodicals as TopicPneumonia, ViralSARS-CoV-2Skin DiseasesSocieties, Medical

Identifiers

PMID32498128
PMCPMC7301033
OpenAlexW3033883745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.