Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32497742›Full record

ArticleActa biomaterialia2020

Design and evaluation of collagen-inspired mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites for bone regeneration.

Akhil Patel, Samer H Zaky, Karen Schoedel, Hongshuai Li, Vinayak Sant, Elia Beniash, Charles Sfeir, Donna B Stolz, Shilpa Sant

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta biomaterialia, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Application and prospects of nanomaterials in osteoporosis treatment.International journal of pharmaceutics: X · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. The effect of green synthesis of TiOVeterinary medicine and science · 2023
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. SrFeMaterials today. Bio · 2022
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Akhil PatelDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Samer H ZakyCenter for Craniofacial Regeneration, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Karen SchoedelDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Hongshuai LiMusculoskeletal Growth & Regeneration Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Vinayak SantDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261.
Elia BeniashCenter for Craniofacial Regeneration, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Charles SfeirCenter for Craniofacial Regeneration, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Donna B StolzDepartment of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; Department of Cell Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Shilpa SantDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15261; Department of Bioengineering, Swanson School of Engineering, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15219; McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA 15260; UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260. Electronic address: shs149@pitt.edu.
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JOHN C. BYRD · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone loss due to trauma and tumors remains a serious clinical concern. Due to limited availability and disease transmission risk with autografts and allografts, calcium phosphate bone fillers and growth factor-based substitute bone grafts are currently used in the clinic. However, substitute grafts lack bone regeneration potential when used without growth factors. When used along with the added growth factors, they lead to unwanted side effects such as uncontrolled bone growth. Collagen-based hydrogel grafts available on the market fail to provide structural guidance to native cells due to high water-solubility and faster degradation. To overcome these limitations, we employed bioinspired material design and fabricated three different hydrogels with structural features similar to native collagen at multiple length-scales. These hydrogels fabricated using polyionic complexation of oppositely charged natural polysaccharides exhibited multi-scale architecture mimicking nanoscale banding pattern, and microscale fibrous structure of native collagen. All three hydrogels promoted biomimetic apatite-like mineral deposition in vitro elucidating crystalline structure on the surface while amorphous calcium phosphate inside the hydrogels resulting in mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites. When evaluated in a non-load bearing critical size mouse calvaria defect model, chitosan - kappa carrageenan mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites enhanced bone regeneration without added growth factors compared to empty defect as well as widely used marketed collagen scaffolds. Histological assessment of the regenerated bone revealed improved healing and tissue remodeling with mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites. Overall, these collagen-inspired mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites showed multi-scale hierarchical structure and can potentially serve as promising bioactive hydrogel to promote bone regeneration. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Hydrogels, especially collagen, are widely used in bone tissue engineering. Collagen fibrils play arguably the most important role during natural bone development. Its multi-scale hierarchical structure to form fibers from fibrils and electrostatic charges enable mineral sequestration, nucleation, and growth. However, bulk collagen hydrogels exhibit limited bone regeneration and are mostly used as carriers for highly potent growth factors such as bone morphogenic protein-2, which increase the risk of uncontrolled bone growth. Thus, there is an unmet clinical need for a collagen-inspired biomaterial that can recreate structural hierarchy, mineral sequestration ability, and stimulate recruitment of host progenitor cells to facilitate bone regeneration. Here, we propose collagen-inspired bioactive mineral-hydrogel nanocomposites as a growth factor-free approach to guide and enhance bone regeneration.

Indexed as

HydrogelsNanocompositesAnimalsBone RegenerationCollagenMiceTissue EngineeringCollagenHydrogelsBioactive biomaterialsBone regenerationCalcium phosphateCarrageenanChitosanMineral-hydrogel nanocompositesMouse calvaria defectPolysaccharides

Identifiers

PMID32497742
PMCPMC7446305
OpenAlexW3033594749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.