Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32497203›Full record

ArticleInternational health2021

Householders' perception about sustaining the useful life of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets in Ghana.

Robert Opoku, Padmore Adusei Amoah, Kingsley Atta Nyamekye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International health, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert OpokuPMI VectorLink Project, Population Services International (PSI), P.O. Box Ct 4274, Cantonments, Accra, Ghana.
Padmore Adusei AmoahSchool of Graduate Studies, Asia Pacific Institute of Ageing Studies, Centre for Social Policy and Social Change, Lingnan University, 8 Castle Peak Rd., Tuen Mun, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Kingsley Atta NyamekyeDepartment of Planning and Sustainability, School of Geo-Sciences, University of Energy and Natural Resources. P.O.Box 214, Sunyani, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis article explores the multifaceted perceptions among householders about the care, efficacy and disposal of long-lasting insecticide-treated nets (LLINs), especially those regarding the end of the useful life of LLINs, and their implications for malaria control.

methodsWe used a cross-sectional qualitative design. Data were gathered in the Shai-Osudoku District in the Greater Accra Region of Ghana using focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. A thematic analysis technique was applied to analyse the data.

resultsFour findings emerged. First, participants were familiar with LLINs and the issues concerning the end of their useful life. However, the application of this knowledge was deficient. Second, characteristics of effectiveness (e.g. torn beyond repair) other than the age of a net determined the end of the useful life of LLINs. Third, social desirability and other social practices had positive and negative influences on perceptions about LLIN use and the end of their useful life. Fourth, repurposing of LLINs signified the end of their useful life.

conclusionsPolicies and strategies to position LLIN use as the leading resource for malaria control need to be innovative to accommodate the perceptions and practices of targeted households.

Indexed as

InsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsCross-Sectional StudiesGhanaHumansMosquito ControlPerceptionInsecticidesend of useful lifeGhanalong-lasting insecticide-treated netsmalariaperceptionsocial practices

Identifiers

PMID32497203
PMCPMC7807238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.