Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32497092›Full record

ArticlePloS one2020

Identification and management of young infants with possible serious bacterial infection where referral was not feasible in rural Lucknow district of Uttar Pradesh, India: An implementation research.

Shally Awasthi, Naveen Kesarwani, Raj Kumar Verma, Girdhar Gopal Agarwal, Luxmi Shanker Tewari, Ravi Krishna Mishra, Lalji Shukla, Arun Kumar Raut, Shamim Ahmad Qazi, Samira Aboubaker and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Shally AwasthiDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-1254-9802
Naveen KesarwaniDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Raj Kumar VermaDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Girdhar Gopal AgarwalDepartment of Statistics, University of Lucknow, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Luxmi Shanker TewariDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ravi Krishna MishraDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Lalji ShuklaDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arun Kumar RautDepartment of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shamim Ahmad QaziDepartment of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9688-9259
Samira AboubakerDepartment of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Yasir Bin NisarDepartment of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health and Aging, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Rajiv BahlDepartment of Maternal Newborn Child and Adolescent Health and Aging, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Monika AgarwalDepartment of Social and Preventive Medicine, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
King George's Medical University · INWorld Health Organization · CHUniversity of Lucknow · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBased on World Health Organization guidelines, Government of India recommended management of possible serious bacterial infection (PSBI) in young infants up to two months of age on an outpatient basis where referral is not feasible. We implemented the guideline in program setting to increase access to treatment with high treatment success and low resultant mortality.

methodsImplementation research was conducted in four rural blocks of Lucknow district in Uttar Pradesh, India. It included policy dialogues with the central and state government and district level officials. A Technical Support Unit was established. Thereafter, capacity building across all cadres of health workers in the implementation area was done for strengthening of home based newborn care (HBNC) program, skills enhancement for identification and management of PSBI, logistics management to ensure availability of necessary supplies, monitoring and evaluation as well as providing feedback. Data was collected by the research team.

resultsFrom June 2017 to February 2019 there were 24,448 live births in a population of 856106. We identified 1302 infants, aged 0-59 days, with any sign of PSBI leading to a coverage of 53% (1302/2445), assuming an incidence of 10%. However, in the establishment phase the coverage was 33%, while it was 85% in the implementation phase. Accredited social health activists (ASHAs) identified 81.2% (1058/1302) cases while rest were identified by families. ASHAs increased home visits within first 7 days of life in home based newborn care program from 74.3% (2781/3738) to 89.0% (3128/3513) and detection of cases of PSBI from 1.6% (45/2781) to 8.7% (275/3128) in the first and last quarter of the project, respectively. Of these 18.7% (244/1302) refused referral to government health system and 6.7% (88/1302) were treated in a hospital. Among cases of PSBI, there were 13.3% (173/1302) cases of fast breathing in young infant aged 7-59 days in whom referral was not needed. Of these 147 were treated by oral amoxicillin and 95.2% (140/147) were cured. Among those who needed referral, simplified treatment was given when referral was refused. There were 2.9% (37/1302) cases of fast breathing at ages of 0-6 days of which 34 were treated by simplified treatment with100% (34/34) cured;66.5% (866/1302) were cases of clinical severe infection of which 685 treated by simplified treatment with94.2% (645/685)cured and 09 died;17.3% (226/1302) cases of critical illness of which 93 were treated by simplified treatment, as a last resort, 72% (67/93) cured and 16 died. Among 255 cases who either did not seek formal treatment or sought it at private facilities, 96 died.

conclusionSimplified treatment for PSBI is feasible in public program settings in northern India with good cure rates. It required system strengthening and supportive supervision.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultBacterial InfectionsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIndiaInfantMaleMiddle AgedPractice Guidelines as TopicReferral and ConsultationRural PopulationSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID32497092
PMCPMC7272098
OpenAlexW3033261352

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.