ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2020
Binding Site Interactions of Modulators of Breast Cancer Resistance Protein, Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein 2, and P-Glycoprotein Activity.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Measuring blood-brain barrier dysfunction: a critical appraisal of fluid biomarkers, in vitro models, in vivo imaging, and post-mortem approaches.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Review
- Efflux and uptake transport and gut microbial reactivation of raloxifene glucuronides.Basic & clinical pharmacology & toxicology · 2025Article
- Analysing potent biomarkers along phytochemicals for breast cancer therapy: an in silico approach.Breast cancer research and treatment · 2024Article
- Article
- Interaction of a Homologous Series of Amphiphiles with P-glycoprotein in a Membrane Environment-Contributions of Polar and Non-Polar Interactions.Pharmaceutics · 2023Article
- Effects of Sulforaphane-Induced Cell Death upon Repeated Passage of Either P-Glycoprotein-Negative or P-Glycoprotein-Positive L1210 Cell Variants.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Drug Transporters in the Kidney: Perspectives on Species Differences, Disease Status, and Molecular Docking.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
- The Role of Uptake and Efflux Transporters in the Disposition of Glucuronide and Sulfate Conjugates.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ATP-binding cassette (ABC)-transporters protect tissues by pumping their substrates out of the cells in many physiological barriers, such as the blood-brain barrier, intestine, liver, and kidney. These substrates include various endogenous metabolites, but, in addition, ABC transporters recognize a wide range of compounds, therefore affecting the disposition and elimination of clinically used drugs and their metabolites. Although numerous ABC-transporter inhibitors are known, the underlying mechanism of inhibition is not well characterized. The aim of this study is to deepen our understanding of transporter inhibition by studying the molecular basis of ligand recognition. In the current work, we compared the effect of 44 compounds on the active transport mediated by three ABC transporters: breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP and ABCG2), multidrug-resistance associated protein (MRP2 and ABCC2), and P-glycoprotein (P-gp and ABCB1). Eight compounds were strong inhibitors of all three transporters, while the activity of 36 compounds was transporter-specific. Of the tested compounds, 39, 25, and 11 were considered as strong inhibitors, while 1, 4, and 11 compounds were inactive against BCRP, MRP2, and P-gp, respectively. In addition, six transport-enhancing stimulators were observed for P-gp. In order to understand the observed selectivity, we compared the surface properties of binding cavities in the transporters and performed structure-activity analysis and computational docking of the compounds to known binding sites in the transmembrane domains and nucleotide-binding domains. Based on the results, the studied compounds are more likely to interact with the transmembrane domain than the nucleotide-binding domain. Additionally, the surface properties of the substrate binding site in the transmembrane domains of the three transporters were in line with the observed selectivity. Because of the high activity toward BCRP, we lacked the dynamic range needed to draw conclusions on favorable interactions; however, we identified amino acids in both P-gp and MRP2 that appear to be important for ligand recognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.