Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32496566›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2020

Dose Timing of D-Cycloserine to Augment Exposure Therapy for Social Anxiety Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Jasper A J Smits, Mark H Pollack, David Rosenfield, Michael W Otto, Sheila Dowd, Joseph Carpenter, Christina D Dutcher, Elizabeth M Lewis, Sara M Witcraft, Santiago Papini and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02066792 (Dose Timing of D-Cycloserine to Augment CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder), which is not on this map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02066792 early_phase1completednot on this map

Dose Timing of D-Cycloserine to Augment CBT for Social Anxiety Disorder

TypeinterventionalSponsorJasper A. SmitsRan2014 to 2018Enrolled152ConditionsSocial Anxiety DisorderArmsD-Cycloserine, Placebo, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 9 institutions in 1 country.

Jasper A J SmitsInstitute for Mental Health Research, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
Mark H PollackDepartment of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
David RosenfieldDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.
Michael W OttoDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Sheila DowdDepartment of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Joseph CarpenterDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Christina D DutcherInstitute for Mental Health Research, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
Elizabeth M LewisDepartment of Psychiatry, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois.
Sara M WitcraftInstitute for Mental Health Research, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
Santiago PapiniInstitute for Mental Health Research, Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin.
Joshua CurtissDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Leigh AndrewsDepartment of Psychology, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, Texas.
Shelley KindDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Kristina ConroyDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Stefan G HofmannDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts.
Boston University · USThe University of Texas at Austin · USSouthern Methodist University · USFlorida International University · USLouisiana State University · USMyriad Genetics · USRush University Medical Center · USSuffolk University · USUniversity of Mississippi · US

Funding

2/3-Dose Timing of D-cycloserine to Augment CBT for Social Anxiety DisorderR34MH099311 · NIMH · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI HOFMANN, STEFAN G. · 2014 to 2016
$737k
Dose Timing of D-cycloserine to Augment CBT for Social Anxiety DisorderR34MH099309 · NIMH · RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI POLLACK, MARK H · 2014 to 2016
$698k
3/3-Dose Timing of D-cycloserine to Augment CBT for Social Anxiety DisorderR34MH099318 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI SMITS, JASPER · 2014 to 2016
$695k
NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099309NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099311NIMH NIH HHS R34 MH099318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Findings suggest that the efficacy of D-cycloserine (DCS) for enhancing exposure therapy may be strongest when administered after sessions marked by low fear at the conclusion of exposure practice. These findings have prompted investigation of DCS dosing tailored to results of exposure sessions. Objective: To compare tailored postsession DCS administration with presession DCS administration, postsession DCS administration, and placebo augmentation of exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder. Design, Setting, and Participants: This double-blind randomized clinical trial involved adults with social anxiety disorder enrolled at 3 US university centers. Symptom severity was assessed at baseline, weekly during treatment, and at 1-week and 3-month follow-up. Data analysis was performed from September 2019 to March 2020. Interventions: Participants completed a 5-session treatment and received pills commensurate with their condition assignment at sessions 2 through 5, which emphasized exposure practice. Main Outcomes and Measures: Symptom severity was evaluated by the Liebowitz Social Anxiety Scale and Social Phobic Disorders-Severity Form as administered by independent evaluators. Results: A total of 152 participants were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 29.24 [10.16] years; 84 men [55.26%]). Compared with placebo, presession and postsession conditions showed greater symptom improvement (b = -0.25; 95% CI, -0.37 to -0.13; P < .001; d = 1.07; and b = -0.20; 95% CI, -0.32 to -0.07; P = .002; d = 0.85) and lower symptom severity (b = -0.51; 95% CI, -0.81 to -0.21; P < .001; d = 0.76; and b = -0.49; 95% CI, -0.80 to -0.18; P = .002; d = 0.72) at 3-month follow-up. No differences were found between presession and postsession conditions. The tailored condition showed no advantage over placebo. Compared with the tailored condition, presession and postsession conditions evidenced greater decreases (b = -0.22; 95% CI, -0.34 to -0.10; P < .001; d = 0.94; and b = -0.17, 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.04; P = .008; d = 0.72) and lower symptom severity (b = -0.44, 95% CI, -0.73 to -0.14; P = .004; d = 0.64; and b = -0.41, 95% CI, -0.72 to -0.11; P = .008; d = 0.61) at 3-month follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: Administration of DCS enhanced exposure therapy for social anxiety disorder when given before or after the exposure session. However, the study failed to achieve the aim to develop a tailored clinical application. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02066792.

Indexed as

AdultAntibiotics, AntitubercularCase-Control StudiesCycloserineDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansImplosive TherapyMalePhobia, SocialPlacebosSeverity of Illness IndexAntibiotics, AntitubercularCycloserinePlacebos

Identifiers

PMID32496566
PMCPMC7273198
OpenAlexW3030076056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.