ArticleJAMA oncology2020
Evaluation of First-line Radiosurgery vs Whole-Brain Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer Brain Metastases: The FIRE-SCLC Cohort Study.
Article in JAMA oncology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06457906 (SRS/SRT/Hypo-RT Versus HA-WBRT for No More Than 10 Brain Metastases in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 124 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
SRS/SRT/Hypo-RT Versus HA-WBRT for No More Than 10 Brain Metastases in Patients With Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Prospective, Randomized, Multicenter Phase III Trial (SHARP Trial)
Who cites it
124 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 200 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of stereotactic radiosurgery versus whole brain radiotherapy for the treatment of brain metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025Pooled it
- Comprehensive Analysis of Lung Cancer Metastasis: Sites, Rates, Survival, and Risk Factors-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.The clinical respiratory journal · 2025Pooled it
- Brain metastases: A Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) consensus review on current management and future directions.Neuro-oncology · 2022Guideline
- DEGRO practical guideline for central nervous system radiation necrosis part 1: classification and a multistep approach for diagnosis.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2022Guideline
- Risk Factors for Brain Metastases in Patients With Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Parotid metastases from primary lung cancer: Case series and systematic review of the features.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Pooled it
- Discordance between clinician- and patient-reported outcomes during radiotherapy for brain metastases: the prospective NeuroPRO study.Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2027Article
- Development and external validation of an XGBoost-based prognostic model for small cell lung cancer with brain metastases.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- Prophylactic cranial irradiation versus active MRI surveillance for limited-stage small-cell lung cancer achieving response after chemoradiotherapy: a protocol for a randomized, controlled, multicenter, phase III trial.Respiratory research · 2026Article
- Review
- Association of Expression of YTH-Domain Family Protein 3 (YTHDF3) With Brain Metastases and Unfavorable Survival in Patients With Stage IV Lung Adenocarcinoma.Molecular carcinogenesis · 2026Article
- Review
- Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation and Survival in Limited-Stage SCLC: A Multicenter Real-World Analysis From the Canadian SCLC Database (CASCADE).JTO clinical and research reports · 2026Article
- [Advances in Systemic Therapy for Extensive-stage Small Cell Lung Cancer in the Era of Precision Treatment].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2026Review
- Outcomes of Lurbinectedin in Central Nervous System Metastases of Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Case Series.Reports (MDPI) · 2026Article
- A single-arm, single-center phase II clinical study of concurrent brain radiotherapy combined with tislelizumab and chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer and brain metastases.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Local control and dose selection for lung cancer brain metastases treated with radiosurgery: an artificial intelligence model.Clinical & experimental metastasis · 2026Article
- Addressing Unmet Needs in the Management of Small Cell Lung Cancer: Treatment of Brain Metastases, Quality of Life, and the Role of Real-World Evidence.Current treatment options in oncology · 2026Review
- Article
64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
59 authors at 20 institutions in 6 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Although stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is preferred for limited brain metastases from most histologies, whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) has remained the standard of care for patients with small cell lung cancer. Data on SRS are limited. Objective: To characterize and compare first-line SRS outcomes (without prior WBRT or prophylactic cranial irradiation) with those of first-line WBRT. Design, Setting, and Participants: FIRE-SCLC (First-line Radiosurgery for Small-Cell Lung Cancer) was a multicenter cohort study that analyzed SRS outcomes from 28 centers and a single-arm trial and compared these data with outcomes from a first-line WBRT cohort. Data were collected from October 26, 2017, to August 15, 2019, and analyzed from August 16, 2019, to November 6, 2019. Interventions: SRS and WBRT for small cell lung cancer brain metastases. Main Outcomes and Measures: Overall survival, time to central nervous system progression (TTCP), and central nervous system (CNS) progression-free survival (PFS) after SRS were evaluated and compared with WBRT outcomes, with adjustment for performance status, number of brain metastases, synchronicity, age, sex, and treatment year in multivariable and propensity score-matched analyses. Results: In total, 710 patients (median [interquartile range] age, 68.5 [62-74] years; 531 men [74.8%]) who received SRS between 1994 and 2018 were analyzed. The median overall survival was 8.5 months, the median TTCP was 8.1 months, and the median CNS PFS was 5.0 months. When stratified by the number of brain metastases treated, the median overall survival was 11.0 months (95% CI, 8.9-13.4) for 1 lesion, 8.7 months (95% CI, 7.7-10.4) for 2 to 4 lesions, 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.4-9.6) for 5 to 10 lesions, and 5.5 months (95% CI, 4.3-7.6) for 11 or more lesions. Competing risk estimates were 7.0% (95% CI, 4.9%-9.2%) for local failures at 12 months and 41.6% (95% CI, 37.6%-45.7%) for distant CNS failures at 12 months. Leptomeningeal progression (46 of 425 patients [10.8%] with available data) and neurological mortality (80 of 647 patients [12.4%] with available data) were uncommon. On propensity score-matched analyses comparing SRS with WBRT, WBRT was associated with improved TTCP (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.26-0.55; P < .001), without an improvement in overall survival (median, 6.5 months [95% CI, 5.5-8.0] for SRS vs 5.2 months [95% CI, 4.4-6.7] for WBRT; P = .003) or CNS PFS (median, 4.0 months for SRS vs 3.8 months for WBRT; P = .79). Multivariable analyses comparing SRS and WBRT, including subset analyses controlling for extracranial metastases and extracranial disease control status, demonstrated similar results. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that the primary trade-offs associated with SRS without WBRT, including a shorter TTCP without a decrease in overall survival, are similar to those observed in settings in which SRS is already established.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.