Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32496521›Full record

SynthesisJAMA2020

Association of Noninvasive Oxygenation Strategies With All-Cause Mortality in Adults With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Bruno L Ferreyro, Federico Angriman, Laveena Munshi, Lorenzo Del Sorbo, Niall D Ferguson, Bram Rochwerg, Michelle J Ryu, Refik Saskin, Hannah Wunsch, Bruno R da Costa and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readNetwork Meta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in JAMA, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06582459 (Efficacy and Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Associated Acute Respiratory Failure), which is not on this map. Cited by 214 papers, 13 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
214citing papers in PubMed, 13 pooled it
39.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06582459 active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy and Safety of High-Flow Nasal Cannula Versus Noninvasive Ventilation for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension-Associated Acute Respiratory Failure: A Retrospective Cohort Study Stratified by Right Ventricular Dysfunction Severity

TypeobservationalSponsorThe First People's Hospital of NeijiangRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsPulmonary Arterial Hypertension, Acute Respiratory Failure, High-flow Nasal Cannula, Noninvasive VentilationArmsHFNC treatment, NIV treatment
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

214 citing papers in PubMed, 13 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 440 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Effect of noninvasive respiratory support on interstitial lung disease with acute respiratory failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of respiratory therapy : CJRT = Revue canadienne de la therapie respiratoire : RCTR · 2023
    Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Pooled it
  13. Pooled it
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

154 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Bruno L FerreyroInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Federico AngrimanInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Laveena MunshiInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lorenzo Del SorboInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Niall D FergusonInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bram RochwergDepartment of Medicine, Division of Critical Care, and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Michelle J RyuSidney Liswood Health Science Library, Mount Sinai Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Refik SaskinInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Hannah WunschInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Bruno R da CostaInstitute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Damon C ScalesInterdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
University of Toronto · CAInstitute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences · CAUniversity Health Network · CAMcMaster University · CAMount Sinai Hospital · CAPublic Health Ontario · CASt. Michael's Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Treatment with noninvasive oxygenation strategies such as noninvasive ventilation and high-flow nasal oxygen may be more effective than standard oxygen therapy alone in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Objective: To compare the association of noninvasive oxygenation strategies with mortality and endotracheal intubation in adults with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure. Data Sources: The following bibliographic databases were searched from inception until April 2020: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Web of Science, and LILACS. No limits were applied to language, publication year, sex, or race. Study Selection: Randomized clinical trials enrolling adult participants with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure comparing high-flow nasal oxygen, face mask noninvasive ventilation, helmet noninvasive ventilation, or standard oxygen therapy. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Two reviewers independently extracted individual study data and evaluated studies for risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. Network meta-analyses using a bayesian framework to derive risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences along with 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were conducted. GRADE methodology was used to rate the certainty in findings. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was all-cause mortality up to 90 days. A secondary outcome was endotracheal intubation up to 30 days. Results: Twenty-five randomized clinical trials (3804 participants) were included. Compared with standard oxygen, treatment with helmet noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.40 [95% CrI, 0.24-0.63]; absolute risk difference, -0.19 [95% CrI, -0.37 to -0.09]; low certainty) and face mask noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.83 [95% CrI, 0.68-0.99]; absolute risk difference, -0.06 [95% CrI, -0.15 to -0.01]; moderate certainty) were associated with a lower risk of mortality (21 studies [3370 patients]). Helmet noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.26 [95% CrI, 0.14-0.46]; absolute risk difference, -0.32 [95% CrI, -0.60 to -0.16]; low certainty), face mask noninvasive ventilation (RR, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.62-0.90]; absolute risk difference, -0.12 [95% CrI, -0.25 to -0.05]; moderate certainty) and high-flow nasal oxygen (RR, 0.76 [95% CrI, 0.55-0.99]; absolute risk difference, -0.11 [95% CrI, -0.27 to -0.01]; moderate certainty) were associated with lower risk of endotracheal intubation (25 studies [3804 patients]). The risk of bias due to lack of blinding for intubation was deemed high. Conclusions and Relevance: In this network meta-analysis of trials of adult patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure, treatment with noninvasive oxygenation strategies compared with standard oxygen therapy was associated with lower risk of death. Further research is needed to better understand the relative benefits of each strategy.

Indexed as

HypoxiaIntubation, IntratrachealNoninvasive VentilationOxygenRespiratory InsufficiencyAdultAgedBayes TheoremBiasCause of DeathHead Protective DevicesHumansMasksMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicOxygen

Identifiers

PMID32496521
PMCPMC7273316
OpenAlexW3030675705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.