ReviewNicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco2021
Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches.
Review in Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Investigating the population health impact of an oral tobacco-derived nicotine pouch product utilizing a three-product tobacco use population model.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Unveiling Smoking Behavior Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study in the United Arab Emirates.Cureus · 2025Article
- Potential impact of e-cigarettes on life-years lost from conventional smoking in Ukraine, a replication study.Central European journal of public health · 2025Article
- Exploring Interrelationships Among Numeracy, Cancer Risk Perceptions, and Tobacco Product Use.Tobacco use insights · 2025Article
- Modeling the population health impact of accurate and inaccurate perceptions of harm from nicotine.Harm reduction journal · 2024Article
- Article
- The Potential Impact of E-cigarettes on the Life-Years Lost from Conventional Smoking in the Russian Federation.Journal of consumer policy · 2023Article
- A Decision-Theoretic Public Health Framework for Heated Tobacco and Nicotine Vaping Products.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
- Estimating the public health impact had tobacco-free nicotine pouches been introduced into the US in 2000.BMC public health · 2022Article
- Balancing Consideration of the Risks and Benefits of E-Cigarettes.American journal of public health · 2021Article
- A Magic Bullet? The Potential Impact of E-Cigarettes on the Toll of Cigarette Smoking.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2021Article
- Investigating the Health Effects of 3 Coexisting Tobacco-Related Products Using System Dynamics Population Modeling: An Italian Population Case Study.Frontiers in public health · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVarious approaches have been used to estimate the population health impact of introducing a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP). AIMS AND
methodsWe aimed to compare and contrast aspects of models considering effects on mortality that were known to experts attending a meeting on models in 2018.
resultsThirteen models are described, some focussing on e-cigarettes, others more general. Most models are cohort-based, comparing results with or without MRTP introduction. They typically start with a population with known smoking habits and then use transition probabilities either to update smoking habits in the "null scenario" or joint smoking and MRTP habits in an "alternative scenario". The models vary in the tobacco groups and transition probabilities considered. Based on aspects of the tobacco history developed, the models compare mortality risks, and sometimes life-years lost and health costs, between scenarios. Estimating effects on population health depends on frequency of use of the MRTP and smoking, and the extent to which the products expose users to harmful constituents. Strengths and weaknesses of the approaches are summarized.
conclusionsDespite methodological differences, most modellers have assumed the increase in risk of mortality from MRTP use, relative to that from cigarette smoking, to be very low and have concluded that MRTP introduction is likely to have a beneficial impact. Further model development, supplemented by preliminary results from well-designed epidemiological studies, should enable more precise prediction of the anticipated effects of MRTP introduction. IMPLICATIONS: There is a need to estimate the population health impact of introducing modified risk nicotine-containing products for smokers unwilling or unable to quit. This paper reviews a variety of modeling methodologies proposed to do this, and discusses the implications of the different approaches. It should assist modelers in refining and improving their models, and help toward providing authorities with more reliable estimates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.