Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32496429›Full record

ArticleA&A practice2020

Comparison of the Effectiveness of Different Barrier Enclosure Techniques in Protection of Healthcare Workers During Tracheal Intubation and Extubation.

Mohamed Ibrahim, Ejaz Khan, Rovnat Babazade, Michelle Simon, Rakesh Vadhera

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in A&A practice, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohamed IbrahimFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas.
Ejaz KhanFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas.
Rovnat BabazadeDepartment of Outcomes Research, Outcomes Research Consortium, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
Michelle SimonFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas.
Rakesh VadheraFrom the Department of Anesthesiology, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas.
The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2) pandemic has created serious challenges to anesthesiologists. As hospitalized patients' respiratory function deteriorates, many will require endotracheal intubation. Airway management of infected patients risks aerosolization of viral-loaded droplets that pose serious hazards to the anesthesiologist and all health care personnel present. The addition of an enclosure barrier during airway management minimizes the hazard by entrapping the droplets and possibly the aerosols within an enclosed space adding additional protection for health care workers. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different barrier enclosure techniques during tracheal intubation and extubation.

Indexed as

Airway ExtubationAirway ManagementAnesthesiologistsAnesthesiologyCoronavirus InfectionsCOVID-19Equipment DesignHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, Patient-to-ProfessionalIntubation, IntratrachealManikinsOccupational ExposurePandemicsPersonnel, HospitalPneumonia, Viral

Identifiers

PMID32496429
PMCPMC7302074
OpenAlexW3029546447

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.