Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32496196›Full record

Observational studyJournal of medical Internet research2020

Evaluating the Need to Address Digital Literacy Among Hospitalized Patients: Cross-Sectional Observational Study.

Hanna Vollbrecht, Vineet Arora, Sebastian Otero, Kyle Carey, David Meltzer, Valerie G Press

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of medical Internet research, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
11.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. [Concept of Digital Health Literacy: A Scoping Review].Jugan geon-gang gwa jilbyeong · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Real-World Use of Inhaled COPD Medications: the Good, the Bad, the Ugly.Chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases (Miami, Fla.) · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hanna VollbrechtPritzker School of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4978-6484
Vineet AroraSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4745-7599
Sebastian OteroSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8437-543X
Kyle CareySection of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5038-6074
David MeltzerSection of Hospital Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2790-7393
Valerie G PressSection of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-9961-4878
University of Chicago · US

Funding

Short Term Aging-Related Research ProgramT35AG029795 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Vineet Arora, DAVID O MELTZER · 2008 to 2026
$1.4M
Video vs. TTG Respiratory inhaler technique Assessment and InstructioN (V-TRAIN)K23HL118151 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRESS, VALERIE G · 2013 to 2016
$658k
Mentoring Patient-Oriented Research: Sleep & Health During & After Hospital StayK24HL136859 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ARORA, VINEET · 2017 to 2021
$572k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL118151NHLBI NIH HHS K24 HL136859NIA NIH HHS T35 AG029795
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTechnology is a potentially powerful tool to assist patients with transitions of care during and after hospitalization. Patients with low health literacy who are predisposed to poor health outcomes are particularly poised to benefit from such interventions. However, this population may lack the ability to effectively engage with technology. Although prior research studied the role of health literacy in technology access/use among outpatients, hospitalized patient populations have not been investigated in this context. Further, with the rapid uptake of technology, access may no longer be pertinent, and differences in technological capabilities may drive the current digital divide. Thus, characterizing the digital literacy of hospitalized patients across health literacy levels is paramount.

objectiveWe sought to determine the relationship between health literacy level and technological access, use, and capability among hospitalized patients.

methodsAdult inpatients completed a technology survey that asked about technology access/use and online capabilities as part of an ongoing quality of care study. Participants' health literacy level was assessed utilizing the 3-question Brief Health Literacy Screen. Descriptive statistics, bivariate chi-squared analyses, and multivariate logistic regression analyses (adjusting for age, race, gender, and education level) were performed. Using Bonferroni correction for the 18 tests, the threshold P value for significance was <.003.

resultsAmong 502 enrolled participants, the mean age was 51 years, 71.3% (358/502) were African American, half (265/502, 52.8%) were female, and half (253/502, 50.4%) had at least some college education. Over one-third (191/502, 38.0%) of participants had low health literacy. The majority of participants owned devices (owned a smartphone: 116/173, 67.1% low health literacy versus 235/300, 78.3% adequate health literacy, P=.007) and had used the Internet previously (143/189, 75.7% low health literacy versus 281/309, 90.9% adequate health literacy, P<.001). Participants with low health literacy were more likely to report needing help performing online tasks (133/189, 70.4% low health literacy versus 135/303, 44.6% adequate health literacy, P<.001). In the multivariate analysis, when adjusting for age, race, gender, and education level, we found that low health literacy was not significantly associated with a lower likelihood of owning smartphones (OR: 0.8, 95% CI 0.5-1.4; P=.52) or using the internet ever (OR: 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9; P=.02). However, low health literacy remained significantly associated with a higher likelihood of needing help performing any online task (OR: 2.2, 95% CI 1.3-3.6; P=.002).

conclusionsThe majority of participants with low health literacy had access to technological devices and had used the internet previously, but they were unable to perform online tasks without assistance. The barriers patients face in using online health information and other health information technology may be more related to online capabilities rather than to technology access. When designing and implementing technological tools for hospitalized patients, it is important to ensure that patients across digital literacy levels can both understand and use them.

Indexed as

Cross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth LiteracyHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatientsdigital literacyhealth literacyhospitalizationtechnology

Identifiers

PMID32496196
PMCPMC7303835
OpenAlexW3012647853

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.