Evidence map›Paper›PMID 32495293›Full record

ArticleCellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2020

Selective capture of plasma cell-free tumor DNA on magnetic beads: a sensitive and versatile tool for liquid biopsy.

Mohammad Amin Kerachian, Marjan Azghandi, Ali Javadmanesh, Kamran Ghaffarzadegan, Sina Mozaffari-Jovin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cellular oncology (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Circulating tumor DNA and its role in detection, prognosis and therapeutics of hepatocellular carcinoma.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Current status of ctDNA in precision oncology for hepatocellular carcinoma.Journal of experimental & clinical cancer research : CR · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Mohammad Amin KerachianMedical Genetics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. amin.kerachian@mail.mcgill.ca.
Marjan AzghandiCancer Genetics Research Unit, Reza Radiotherapy and Oncology Center, Mashhad, Iran.
Ali JavadmaneshCancer Genetics Research Unit, Reza Radiotherapy and Oncology Center, Mashhad, Iran.
Kamran GhaffarzadeganDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Arizona, Scottsdale, AZ, USA.
Sina Mozaffari-JovinMedical Genetics Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran. Sina.Mozaffari-Jovin@mpibpc.mpg.de.
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences · IRFerdowsi University of Mashhad · IRImam Reza Hospital · IRMayo Clinic in Arizona · US

Funding

Iran National Science Foundation 93048371Mashhad University of Medical Sciences 961467Reza Radiotherapy and Oncology Center -
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeRecently, 'solid tumor biopsies' have been challenged by the emergence of 'liquid biopsies', which are aimed at the isolation and detection of circulating cell-free tumor DNA (ctDNA) in body fluids. Here, we developed and optimized a method for selective capture of ctDNA on magnetic beads (SCC-MAG) for mutation detection in plasma of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC).

methodsBlood and tissue samples from 28 CRC patients were included for the detection of KRAS mutations. For the tissue samples, mutation analysis was conducted by high resolution melting (HRM) analysis and sequencing. For the SCC-MAG method, ctDNA was isolated from 200 µl plasma from patients with a mutant KRAS gene. For comparison, ctDNA extraction was carried out using a silica membrane-based method, after which mutations were detected using Intplex allele-specific PCR.

resultsThe mean ctDNA integrity index in plasma samples of cancer patients was 1.03, comparable with that of silica membrane-derived ctDNA (1.011). Notably, the limit of detection for the SCC-MAG approach was lower than that of the silica membrane method and measured 2.25 pg/ml ctDNA in plasma. Our analyses showed that while the silica membrane-based approach was capable of collecting ctDNA from two out of six CRC patient samples (average Cq 34.23), the SCC-MAG captured ctDNA from all samples with an average Cq of 29.76.

conclusionsWe present a robust, reproducible, and highly sensitive method for the analysis of mutation statuses in liquid biopsies. The SCC-MAG method can readily be applied to any nucleic acid target for diagnostic purposes upon careful design of the specific capture probes, and can be multiplexed by several probes to identify multiple targets.

Indexed as

Magnetic PhenomenaMicrospheresAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCell-Free Nucleic AcidsCell Line, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsDNA, NeoplasmFemaleHumansLimit of DetectionLiquid BiopsyMaleMiddle AgedMutationCell-Free Nucleic AcidsDNA, NeoplasmKRAS protein, humanProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Cell-free tumor DNA extractionColorectal cancerctDNAKRAS mutationsPlasmaSerum

Identifiers

PMID32495293
PMCPMC12990742
OpenAlexW3029629083

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.