ArticleLa Radiologia medica2021
Prevalence and clinical significance of incidental extra-intestinal findings in MR enterography: experience of a single University Centre.
Article in La Radiologia medica, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidental Focal Spleen Lesions: Integrated Imaging and Pattern Recognition Approach to the Differential Diagnosis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Imaging of metabolic and overload disorders in tissues and organs.Japanese journal of radiology · 2023Review
- DWI ratios: New indexes for Crohn's disease activity at magnetic resonance enterography?La Radiologia medica · 2023Article
- The Role of Magnetic Resonance Enterography in Crohn's Disease: A Review of Recent Literature.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- The clinical significance of biliary findings in magnetic resonance enterography of patients with inflammatory bowel disease.Polish journal of radiology · 2022Article
- Structured reporting of computed tomography in the staging of colon cancer: a Delphi consensus proposal.La Radiologia medica · 2022Article
- Large Bowel Ischemia/Infarction: How to Recognize It and Make Differential Diagnosis? A Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine the incidence and clinical relevance of extra-intestinal incidental findings (IF) in a cohort of patients with proven or suspected Crohn disease (CD) examined with magnetic resonance enterography (MR-E) in a single University Centre.
methodsBetween January 2018 and June 2019, 182 patients with proven or suspected CD with a planned first MR-E examination, were retrospectively included in this study. Incidental findings were considered as any abnormality identified in the absence of previous clinically suspected or known disease. IF were categorized as unremarkable, benign or potentially relevant findings requiring further imaging or specific treatment.
resultsOf the 182 revised MR-E, extra-intestinal IF were recorded in 70 cases (38.5%); 35 (50%) incidental lesions were recognized as non-significant, 24 (34%) as benign and 11 (16%) as clinically relevant. Moreover, there was a positive correlation between IF and patients' age (p < 0.0001).
conclusionsIn our experience, a high number of IF (38.5%) was found, with a prevalence that increases with patients' age. Clinically relevant findings were found in 16% of MR-E. This means that MR-E is a useful tool to detect IF, therefore, the presence of a radiologist during the image acquisition is crucial in adding sequences to the examination.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.